Change the law 4.6 (Confiscation) to an actual rule.

[Jonah]

What rule do you wish to Edit/Add: Change law 4.6 from a law to a rule.

Your version of the rule: No weapons or evidence shall be confiscated by Law Enforcement when immediate harm is at risk, such as under gun fire or assailants nearby. Evidence is permitted to be confiscated if the officer is unable to watch over the evidence and leaving it where it is would risk it being tampered with by a member of the public.

Why do you believe this rule should be Added/Edited: Currently if an officer confiscates a gun it has to go through IA. While personally I believe that this is beyond stupid. If an officer his or her life is at risk and they confiscate a gun instead of prioritizing their own life, then I'd say that is 3.4.

 

[JRW]

Can already see this effecting so many innocent officers who generally missclick and get phat ars

 

[Jonah]

There is a difference between intentional and accidental.
If it is clearly accidental then a refund request can be issued and there won't be much issues at both parties.

 

[ErmakDimon]

actually in this case an AR would be better than an IA

 

[TinySlayer]

It's against the rules to break the law as a cop.​