Wild take but I favour an even more extreme option.
If you are in a property that is obviously a base for the purposes of committing criminal activity, and you are unarmed, you accept that you will be killed during a raid and that the onus of responsibility is on you as the occupant to arm...
The 2.3 zaptoseconds in-question:
[Org] Wolfgang Eisenhammer [OfficeGang - Collier]: 10 TOES 10 TOES QUICK HOP ON DISCORD WATCH MY STREAM FOR LOCATION IM TURNING MY HALO ESP ON NOW KOS COPS KOS COPS
I wouldn't say that I'm that eloquent any more, @Collier is no stranger to me having early-onset dementia (not actually, but feels like it) and completely missing out key words in sentences in both the spoken and written word.
Maybe brainrot is an actual thing.
I think the operative issue is that the definition of Arrest in the Penal Code currently also - strangely - covers detaining someone purely to gather more information. There isn't a separate definition for detaining. It doesn't mean arrest from the purist legal sense used in real life. Instead...
I don't know (mainly because I haven't thought about it that hard) if the amended wording you've provided sufficiently covers the goal you're trying to achieve, but I do totally appreciate the sentiment behind it and agree with the principles.
I think overall Section 3 of the Penal Code - and...