While I do find that staying in a corner semi-AFK at one of the most public places on the map to be pushing it under 3.4's example on "Failing to avoid Police attention after committing a crime or leave crime scenes or warranted properties promptly", I can't really say I'd find it reasonable to...
The time at the top shows in-game time, not real time.
According to the logs, he had just gotten back into the car, I assumed that if you'd been watching the car to time it, you'd have seen him enter/exit/talk to the NPC with a gun on his back
I have a few questions
@ZBM @Brian Hickman Who were you waiting for, and why couldn't you have done this in a less public location immediately after killing Police?
@2112 Why did you attempt to initiate a tow on a car while 2 visibly armed individuals were inside it, when the car had been there...
I actually disagree with this assessment.
1) Maybe, but if they're friends they could also just choose not to fight, even if they are rivals. At the very least, it'd stop them from cooperating and becoming even bigger zergs. At best, it'd keep the large orgs mainly fighting each other
2) Maybe...
Big changes surrounding the entirety of section 3 are already in the works, it's just taking a ridiculous amount of time because I both haven't had the time to ponder all the gameplay implications all my changes will bring, and because I want to test the new laws against archived complaints...
I'm not sure how else we should really expect players to take revenge on their targets if they're rolling around in large groups. From the looks of things, we believe that you fully intended on going above what was expected of you by simply forcing everyone to surrender, killing your target...
This is all just from May alone. I'm not sure what compelled you to immediately cause problems on Headline's profile and slander a staff member in the process right after your previous ban for being problematic ended. If you genuinely believed there was wrongdoing, you should have reported it...
We all agree that it's already a breach of 3.4 to knowingly steal a car in front of somebody who's going to defend it, but it might be annoying to account for specifically in the rule text.
Thieves should always be minimising the risk of retaliation. It's usually as easy as waiting for the...
While there are absolutely contexts in which flashing a gun at somebody in passive stance is a threatening gesture worthy of escalation (and/or killing them), this situation wasn't one of them.
All of this started over a radio that Taylor kept messing with when it was clear this behaviour was...