Recent content by iiTzWasParsnip

  1. iiTzWasParsnip

    Map Suggestion Intersection outside of FD road markings and signage

    Yeah that's pretty much it, it isn't clear enough and I've seen SGTs + themselves ignore the stop sign as well as myself and others confused if you can even enter oak hill or not lmao
  2. iiTzWasParsnip

    Rule Suggestion (Other)

    I love the way anti says "What the fuck is he doinggggggg" lmfaooooooooooooo
  3. iiTzWasParsnip

    Rule Suggestion (Other)

    I think hostage takers lack the ability in most cases (myself included until recently), to formulate an actual plan that isn't just what everyone else does, which alot of the time just ends up in hostage takers being shot within or outside of policies. About 80% of the hostage situations I have...
  4. iiTzWasParsnip

    Map Suggestion Intersection outside of FD road markings and signage

    Suggestion Title: Intersection outside of FD road markings and signage Suggestion Description: The 3-way intersection outside the Fire Department, leading towards **Oak Hill** confuses me so much, and I've had everyone else say the same thing, better road markings and signage is needed imo. As...
  5. iiTzWasParsnip

    Action Request (bengtpeterson22)

    I guess you can close this now, they got nuked for a separate reason and won't be able to upload any demo if they haven't already, nor would it matter much lmao Thank you for dealing with the case. I appreciate your time spent dealing with the matter.
  6. iiTzWasParsnip

    Action Request (bengtpeterson22)

    No, I mean how would your friend tell you, you had just been raided if there was no one inside the property and no alarms were triggered?
  7. iiTzWasParsnip

    Action Request (bengtpeterson22)

    The house was empty so that doesn't make sense
  8. iiTzWasParsnip

    Rule Suggestion (3.4 Putting your Life at Risk)

    That's a good point, this would more so be for the intention of mugging somebody. I'll edit it to be more specific
  9. iiTzWasParsnip

    Rule Suggestion (3.4 Putting your Life at Risk)

    Suggestion Topic: 3.4 Putting your Life at Risk Suggestion Description: Should be 3.4 to gunpoint an unarmed person, in front of someone unrelated to you, who has their gun out, for the intention of mugging/in muggable zones. Why should this be added?: - Doesn't make sense for this to not...
  10. iiTzWasParsnip

    Action Request (bengtpeterson22)

    Your Steam Name: iiTzWasParsnip Your Roleplay Name: Willie Kushner Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:757087452 Player's Steam Name: bengtpeterson22 Player's Roleplay Name: Bengt Peterson Player's SteamID: STEAMID: STEAM_0:0:408566435 Why should this player be punished?: @Megasaw dealt with F6 2...
  11. iiTzWasParsnip

    Rule Suggestion (3.23 Placing Drugs)

    I mean you're either gaslighting or just trying to justify already killing people. Just do what you want and see how it works out for you lmao
  12. iiTzWasParsnip

    Rule Suggestion (3.23 Placing Drugs)

    It would also be unreasonable to kill cops/civilians over publicly accessible drugs, which risks your own life and freedom by doing so. Because you did not take measures to protect these drugs within a property. If you kill someone for finding your drugs in a public location, you are risking...
  13. iiTzWasParsnip

    Rule Suggestion (3.23 Placing Drugs)

    That "literal quote" doesn't apply to publicly accessible drugs. If it is not on your property, people/police aren't forcing their way in, then you have no right to protect it. By your logic, you could leave a planter, in the middle of the street, then kill anyone who walks up to it. Or kill...
  14. iiTzWasParsnip

    Rule Suggestion (3.23 Placing Drugs)

    I was trying to find the forum. It was debated back in V5, where, growing in publicly accessible places mean you can't kill people for discovering them. As it makes no sense. You aren't actually taking on any risk because they are not within your own property. It's like if you're growing in the...
Back
Top