Recent content by Locksmith

After getting into contact with them on steam, they allege that you had apparently made an attempt to raid their property earlier on in the night, can you comment on what you had done earlier on the night before this had occured please.

Individual had lost their weapon as a result of an illegal base defense at WC2, which was corrected by myself after the situation, which can be shown in this clip here: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/m5fd8irMECreQYPw7?invite=cr-MSxTa1UsMTg1MDY5Njg1&v=4 As such you are liable for the...

Will contact them off platform(steam) as they do not have a forum and are currently banned off server.

You are liable for the following refund: Tier 2 repair of a Nissan Skyline R34 or the cash equivilant had it been repaired. Please make a report with the link to this page attached using the refund request template to recieve your refund when an Admin or higher is online

In this situation, since Internet issues are out of peoples control, I do not find it proportionate nor appropriate to issue a punishment to @BI$HOP here, as that seems to be the main factor regarding him sitting at storage for a prolonged period of time, In addition to this, this action only...

@BI$HOP can you please explain why you sat at storage for an extended period of time after having killed Police during a PD raid?

You are liable for the following refund 1x Hk-45 CT 1x Suppressor 1x CT Mag ItemID :198617209

There has been several days since I had messaged them to reply and I have received no reply, as such I will continue without their statement In this situation, you had shot at the vehicle and at police, had they attempted to defend themselves via pulling their firearm, it wouldn't be considered...

You have quite a few 3.4 punishments Your gonna have to wait this one out.

You are liable to the following refund $75,000 Please make a F6 with the refund request template when an admin or higher is on server to recieve your refund.

In this sit, as explained above there was more then enough distance for Murlon to reverse in a safe manner and then angle his vehicle to allow him to pull his firearm in order to defend himself, as such it was not 3.4.

Will contact the individual

After reviewing your footage, Murlon at least from my opinion, did not violate 3.4 as there was a large distance between you man and him when aiming your weapons, the POV was on whisper and even then, he was at a significant distance so he was able to reverse after seeing weapons pointed...

It seems you have an issue with the length, length is not dealt with via a dispute, that would have to be via a staff complaint on the issuing staff member, which seems to be @Medium Do you still want this open to challenge the validity of the ban though?