Recent content by Rowley

Gamer

Thought you didn't kill anyone :D

GG

W hoodrats

No idea what to even say about that :(

Once again, my suggestion has nothing to do with “not allowing gun fire”. And based on your last couple of comments you are saying the PD are the majority issue for why hostage situations go wrong? What’s your thoughts on the clip linked in this original post then?

The whole purpsoe of holding a hostage is that you SHOULD'VE taken that hostage for a reason, wether that be to get your friends out of jail or get some form of ransom. Whatever it may be there should be a reason, not just because you 'Want a shootout'.

It was a suggestion from a previous game that I have played. Not my actual suggestion. The whole reasoning behind this suggestion is to get MORE roleplay into hostage situations. If you can look at the clip linked in my original post and see nothing wrong with it then somethings gone wrong...

"Negotiations off"...? It's really quite easy to enforce.

Right I do get what your saying but the rules suggested wouldn't give a benefit to either side? Negotiations off, grace period. Fight. Free passage? Chase them after (which happens already im sure).

I'm slightly confused of this mindset of making them "one sided" ? Can one of you guys who keep saying this explain this?

Your 100% right it works both ways. Which is why I have said previously that restrictions being put in place on both sides will improve the overall experience.

Stupid in what way exactly...? I never said it can't turn into more after the exchange of demands? Once free passage is granted and hostages are secure would the PD not pursuit?

So glad somebody has gathered what I am trying to get at...

If the community enjoy having hostage sits as more of a shootout than an actual hostage sit then fair enough. I just find it strange how perpheads is very serious in all other situations except the one that requires a high level of roleplay.