Server Suggestion TeamSpeak Ally Text Channels

Floppa

Floppa

Messages
1,024
Reaction score
700
Points
670
Location
Denmark
Suggestion Title: TeamSpeak Ally Text Channels
Suggestion Description: I suggest adding a second tab in the TeamSpeak app where organisations can have a text channel with each ally. Only organisations at a certain level (for example level 30) can use it. This would make it easier to talk to allies and communicate for example where you're basing, selling drugs and stuff internally within your network of allies and such.. It would help communication stay clear and simple, without being too overpowered like voice chat between allies would be.

I believe a cooldown for each message should be put though, a cooldown of 30 seconds would be fair, its not too slow response time, also not too fast. I do know that a TeamSpeak with allies has already been suggested, but that was voicechat. This is a completely different suggestion in regards to that and i hope you consider it.

IKEA monkey

Server Suggestion Thread 'Allied shared teamspeak.'

Suggestion Title: Allied shared teamspeak.
Suggestion Description: getting a teamspeak VC for allied orgs, it would be a QoL

Why should this be added?:
- this would help alot, with speaking to allied org members at the same time.

What negatives could this have?:
- i dont see, how this could make a negative

What problem would this suggestion solve?: this would solve talking to other orgs during a Bank robbery/Raid
(For example this suggestion is something I wouldn't want, a text channel would be fair if made properly.)

Why should this be added?:
- Makes teamwork between allies easier.
- Helps organisations rely more on allies.
- Feels more realistic and organised.
- Keeps things balanced compared to voice chat.

What negatives could this have?:
- Could give allied groups too much advantage.
- Might make some fights or situations less fair.
- Could be used too much and spammed.

What problem would this suggestion solve?:
- Stops misunderstandings between allies.
- Improves communication so people don’t act against allies by mistake.
- Makes cooperation between organisations smoother and clearer.

Useful Images:
https://imgur.com/a/swNpmPw
 
Last edited:
Upvote 10 Downvote
exrobite said:
dis the kind of stuff tooter should be used for
Click to expand...
Yes, but tooter is unsafe for criminal activity and can be monitered by the police.
It's just a suggestion for a hint more of realism in the real life criminal world where allied cartels and such communicate over encrypted chats.
Using TeamSpeak for a chat channel for each ally would be the way to implement more realism and better communication for crims.
 
cshonza

Server Suggestion Thread 'Shared Teamspeak Channel'

Suggestion Title: Shared Teamspeak Channel
Suggestion Description: It would be great if there was an option to create a shared teamspeak channel for allied orgs, even better would be if you could specify which allied org can see the TS channel

Why should this be added?:
- to communicate with allied orgs in case you base with them
- It would be great for example if 2 smaller orgs wanted to do something together

What negatives could this have?:
- There could be a lot of people in one room

What problem would this suggestion solve?: If I want to...
rxsm

Server Suggestion Thread 'Teamspeak Ally Channel'

Suggestion Title: Teamspeak Ally Channel
Suggestion Description: A channel for allies of organisations to join. e.g. The Informal's Alliance Channel

Why should this be added?:
- Cuz being in teamspeak with 1 person when you're basing with 6 is aids.

Also could help discord metagamers not want to be in discord.

What negatives could this have?:
- Nothing that I could think of.
Jabha

Server Suggestion Thread 'Mutual Teamspeak Channel For Org Allies'

Suggestion Title: Mutual Teamspeak Channel For Org Allies
Suggestion Description: Could be one more channel in the teamspeak app which can access it two allies org so when there is mutual raid communication would be easier

Why should this be added?:
- org allies could communicate to each others

What negatives could this have?:
- i don't see any negatives to this

Note : some one made same suggestion but no one have done anything to it so i take this as a remind

Useful Images:
https://imgur.com/SL0DnOV
Jack Bruhross

Thread 'Org Ally chat and ally Teamspeak.'

Description of the idea:
Org ally chat.
Org ally teamspeak.

Why should this be added? (pros):
Will allow people to communicate easier. Will also give more use for multiple teamspeak channels (org upgrade)

What negatives could this have? (cons):
Nothing.

*Other additions:
/ally - To type in ally chat.
/org - type in normal chat as usual.


*Images: [useful images]

YKWXleYO6Sf9HFG8.png
luke5763

Server Suggestion Thread 'Ally communication system'

Description of the idea:

To add a way that organizations and their allies can quickly communicate with each other. Such as either adding an /ally chat or a teamspeak channel that would allow both organizations to join once they had both reached X level. The level would need to be quite high, possibly higher than the current maximum level.

Due to being able to ally multiple organizations at a time there would need to be some way to toggle between allies with a button / UI change if it were to be similar to the current /org system.


Why should this be added? (pros): ...​
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Disagree

Besides the fact that this has been suggested countless times through the ages, an inter-org communication platform will provide the stepping stone to the criminal side that they need to make organization association virtually moot. If everyone just allies themselves to the orgs with people they prefer, can organize themselves and communicate effectively, there'll basically be no individual organizations. As a blob, you can overpower most opposition much easier. One message, that you're getting raided by cops being sent to the ally chat could summon 30 people and start a small war localized entirely within your slums apartment.

Or, you can organize a colossal PD raid and outnumber the cops 3:1 on a full server with one good message and reliable allies.
Technically what you're suggesting is already possible anyway. Just get numbers of a variety of allied orgs' members and send them text messages when you're being raided, or need assistance, etc.

I'd say this is a step too far in regards to balance. Seems small on paper but if you think about the domino effect this can have, it's not worth it.
 
I'll never get why a middle ground simply can't be met here, it is one of the most suggested things. What about implementing strict limitations to this or alternatives? For example, you can have a group call of phone numbers up to 4 instead which will still function as a regular phone call but with extra people in it.
 
Clarky said:
I'll never get why a middle ground simply can't be met here, it is one of the most suggested things. What about implementing strict limitations to this or alternatives? For example, you can have a group call of phone numbers up to 4 instead which will still function as a regular phone call but with extra people in it.
Click to expand...
Thats also a good idea, but if you look at the criminal view of it, TeamSpeak isnt tracked by law enforcement and at the realistic point nobody in the real world would communicate in this way over a messenger call when handling criminal activities. I know its gonna get denied but realism cutie. Xoxo floppa
 
I think for bank raids, special crim events like that yeah why not. Makes no sense why not, PD Dispatch can see camera inside bank during bank raid and call out 100% accurate comms unless the Dispatcher is retarded. I think a fair way to even the playing field would be to simply add an extra "Bank" VC for when allies are also doing the bank or if you are doing bank everyone doing it w you gets it

For general use tho, normal stuff I dont think so i feel like itll just result in a bunch of small orgs allied for max yield but all practically the same

As said above, a middleground can be met and not be overpowered after reading the other posts I dont understand why its outright denied, a non op middleground can be met.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

cshonza
  • Locked
  • Suggestion Suggestion
Server Suggestion Shared Teamspeak Channel
Replies
1
Views
422
Aquaa
Aquaa
rxsm
  • Locked
  • Suggestion Suggestion
Server Suggestion Teamspeak Ally Channel
Replies
2
Views
1K
Efan
Jabha
  • Locked
  • Suggestion Suggestion
Server Suggestion Mutual Teamspeak Channel For Org Allies
Replies
2
Views
639
Efan
Jack Bruhross
  • Locked
  • Suggestion Suggestion
Org Ally chat and ally Teamspeak.
Replies
1
Views
913
CensoredExe
CensoredExe
luke5763
  • Suggestion Suggestion
Server Suggestion Ally communication system
Replies
19
Views
3K
jacf104
Back
Top