not my issue you put "
Plagiarism of PH website content" next time don't write something so silly. called fair use but as you have stated community, plus I really don't care its not my ban.
How cute. You've gone to school and learned about legislation relating to plagiarism and intellectual property. However, that doesn't limit the rightful use of the term plagiarism which by definition was relevant in that ban; it's so naive and arrogant to call it 'silly'. Clearly you do care about the ban as you got involved, maybe it's best to keep your GCSE Law OE to yourself in future.
its called A level Law never did it at GCSE, I do care to a degree but not willing to get in a massive fight; what this is turning into. My reasoning is you gave a bullshit ban no offense but how can it be plagiarism if he used it in fair use accordance to the law not saying the rules follow the law but their is no rule stating he cant use perpheads stuff
so I could only imagine you reason behind the ban is within the fact he "stole" content and your actions were made of what the law? if not where as their is no rule stating this isn't allowed.
My man does A Level law, but used 'their' instead of 'there'. No use of proper punctuation. I baffled to how you even met the requirements to have A Level law as an option.
So, both jumping into a convo, where both had nothing to do with and most likely haven't read the convo above. Adrish do you even know what the requirements are? Nade your comment is just stupid and not relevant, post again and I will just delete it. Good day to the both of you.
also You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise violates any laws. forums clearly follow the laws in some way
I google 'fair use' which you quoted and arguing that it wasn't copyright due to it. The outcome of my research makes me believe that it clearly wasn't fair use as it wasn't use to " comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work", however used as his own, therefore plagiarism, additionally on the site I saw no reference to PERP, did you?
Adrish it was used for fair use as he wasn't using it for a profitable reason. However, chris you're right I am not saying your not this is a community with its own rules its a luxury to have the chance to play on perp.