Search results

It kind of depends on several factors, including city funds and policies. Cause if policies are widespread and the city funds are draining, then it would not be in the best interest of the city to lower the taxes - no matter how many assasination attempts. In this regard, it is not the mayor's...

You realise it yourself, you shouldn't have disconnected. And while you could not have known it before you disconnected, I was the TFU who was cornering you. Had you stayed and (perhaps) surrendered, we could have solved the guy breaking 3.4 and probably let you go with the gun in your hand...

Those are examples. You already raided him. Why did you feel the need to molotov it?

You're not apologising for your actions, so why is it marked as an apology?

The update gets released on the 13th restart. Meaning it wasn't live when it was posted. Hence why it is dated with the release date.

2.5 Excessive Negativity Players may not excessively impact the experience of others in a negative manner, unless the actions are a proportionate escalation of negative actions that have been performed against the original player. This includes molotoving and destroying another player's props...

No tick or timeframe provided. I've not been able to find it.

Even if they were AFK, it is safe to assume that if there are armed people in your shop, they will likely have interacted with you to attempt zipties/gunpoint. As such, the user will be banned for 3 days.

Very convenient time to time out, huh?

Evidence not provided.

You are disputing the length and comparing your ban to other people. Don't. It is completely irrelevant to your case, and you cannot dispute the length of a ban. You are not denying that you did it, hence this is not a dispute. If you think the ban length is excessive, make a staff complaint...

can flip it around and say "as if it makes sense that a criminal can crash at 50mph, jump out and still shoot accurately".

You need to provide a tickrate or a timeframe in your demo.

@Bigdaddyben4834 please explain your actions.

The user was contacted in-game and has been given ample time to respond. No response has been made despite him playing on the server. As he did this earlier the same say, the user will be banned 1 week for his actions.

If you join the server first, the errors will disappear. If I am to look through your demo, I need a tick to go to.

No evidence provided.

You need to connect to perpheads before viewing the demo. that will load the files.

Recently, I've noticed this too. Idk why it hasn't happened before, but twice yesterday I was hit at low speed and got dizzied up. My proposal would be to decrease damage/Dizziness from low impact (anything below 40), keep it the same at medium (between 40 and 70) and up the damage at high...

It already does. I'm driving 50 down the bridge and a bellend hits me with 50, I'm done either way. You know what's really frustrating though? People crashing in to a full set of police barricades around a crash site, going 90+mph and just driving off like nothing happened. Seeing that video...

It punishes people for driving like a lunatic. Eventually, they'll realise it's not worth the constant repair money and wait time

Honestly, I'm in the opposite boat. I want car damage to increase, especially when you are going 50+ mph. People drive like absolute idiots, and are not scared to ram people.

perpheads_demo_2023-2-5 07-52-16 Roughly near the beginning (3-4 minutes in)

In my mind, Barricade limit should just go under the regular prop limit of a person, meaning up to 30 and then make officers responsible for cleaning up via policy.

I will attempt to contact the person ingame.

https://help.perpheads.com/page/demos

As Jack has already said, your evidence does not provide any insight or usable evidence in this dispute. Please upload a proper form of evidence that shows the part you are disputing. If you use a demo, make sure that you either: Record it and upload the video here. Provide an accurate...

Upload a form of evidence here. If you use your demo, make sure you either: Record it and upload a clip of it. Provide an accurate tick/timeframe for us to review it. Please provide evidence within 48 hours.

This screenshot shows that you own the barrier (Shown in the lower right hand corner). So for this dispute to be acceptd, you need to prove that this barricade was not placed here by you. Without evidence, the dispute will be denied. You have 48 hours from this message.

@Sindarin