Search results

Excerpt from Appealing a Punishment - Information:

Reviewed with @Collier

It's very rare that I accept another apology after I have already reduced the ban but on this occasion I will. However, please understand that further rule breaks - particularly related to 3.4 - is likely to result in an even harsher ban with limited scope for appeal.

tenacious d music disc

Ban reduced to 3 weeks.

Although bans of 6 months or more are typically reviewed in an admin meeting, I will spare them the effort: Please write the appeal yourself. If you need further information, view Appealing a Punishment - Information.

I would have considered this if you hadn't continued breaking the rules whilst @Collier and I were practically babysitting the situation in noclip and telling you what to do.

Please contact an Administrator+ in-game to receive your items.

You've been back for all of 10 minutes and I already think you're a cunt.

@KcsOpinion being AFK does not grant you an exemption to complying with orders under gunpoint, particularly where you are AFK in a muggable zone or within your base. If you want to go AFK in the future, you should either: A) base with a gun in passive in your hands if you want to be able to...

Please note that further 3.4 infractions - particularly where gunpoint is concerned and therefore your compliance - will likely lead to an even harsher ban with limited scope for appeal.

@KcsOpinion please explain your actions within the next 48 hours.

@Akagami shanksss - you will receive a ban for 2-days for 3.4. You did know the individual who was being arrested as he was a member of your organisation and as he went past you, you knew he was going in for a crime that was worthy of an attempted break-out. However, the problem is that you...

Please provide the demo requested by @Scoot within the next 24 hours or this will be denied.

Please contact an Administrator+ in-game to receive your items.

This is not what happened.

Please contact an Administrator+ in-game to receive your items.

Bold of you to advertise @walnash as your Head of Finance when he pussied out of further $1mil, $2mil and $3mil bets respectively, instead cowering in the corner and claiming he was 'overstimulated' @Collier @Dank we must infect this pleb with Imposter Syndrome

The collisions that you caused - under normal circumstances - would have likely tiered the car and caused great damage. The collisions were also very much avoidable had you of driven with a little more care and attention, which is always possible even when the vehicle is stolen. Additionally on...

Is this an apology or a dispute, because it sounds like you don't agree with the ban rather than admitting fault and apologising for your actions?

Gender identity is included in rule 1.2, so you were discriminatory. If you disagree with the length make a Staff Complaint instead. Reviewed with @Collier

Appealing a Punishment - Information

Can you please clarify what it is about the ban that you feel is invalid, e.g., what rules you didn't break and why? Saying that it's invalid because the person was supposedly mad at you because you made an Internal Affairs complaint does not make the ban invalid.

We will assume that you are contesting the validity of the ban and not just the ban length, in which case your dispute is denied. If you wish to have the length reviewed independently you must create a Staff Complaint as this is not dealt with via a Dispute. Let us break this down and look at...

Reviewed with @Collier

Is this an apology or a dispute? If you create an apology then you accept you broke the rules and are apologizing for your actions, in hope for your punishment to be reviewed. If you create a dispute then you feel you haven't broken the rules and want to dispute the legitimacy of the...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recidivism