Search results

I’ve moved this to off topic as it’s more suitable if you’re not actually making a dispute or appeal

Type of bug: Lua Description of the bug: https://perpheads.com/threads/bug-on-server-restart.44823/ is happening again. I'm not sure what further information I can provide other than everyone seems to spawn at normal spawn positions such as City Hall when the server crashes or restarts. How to...

@Exnem You have more perms in the Support forum but nowhere else lol

You were banned by @blobvis 2.0 for the reason @FARSTAD listed above. I would advise appealing your ban through either a dispute or an apology depending on whether or not you believe the ban is incorrect.

AirPods are really weird with windows, sometimes it works perfectly, sometimes it works but sounds like shit, sometimes it doesn’t work at all and I’m not really sure if there’s a proper fix for it

Congratsssss

Congrats mate, very well deserved

I think most people misunderstood what I was trying to say mate. At the moment (unless things change following this thread), yes, all players should be treated equally. However, it's different if people are trying to intentionally cause problems and run up to people saying racist things, etc...

https://perpheads.com/threads/updated-performance-guide-cfg-inside.39046/

(Reply on behalf of @nutrient11 as he is forum banned) As I said to @Youseff before he lost mod, could you please tell me which demo I was recording at the time from logs and I'll get my POV as well as crofts POV leading up to this situation, but nothing else happened before this

Raiders now have to wait 1 hour before assisting others in that raid if they have died so it probably won’t be too much of an issue, most raids don’t last that long

Just civs

I think what he means is discharging a firearm at someone, but not hitting them, isn't actually grounds to charge someone for 9.2 as you have to "[apply] or [cause] reckless injury" that is likely to cause great bodily injury for it to be an offence instead of just causing apprehension with an...

There’s no need for robbery to have any aggravating factors, you would already be guilty of an offence by using force against someone during a robbery and with rule 2.5 there should be no need for people to take it much further, and then it’s likely just going to be a Section 9 offence.

Accepted You may be new but this doesn’t excuse you from following the rules and it is your responsibility to know them. You will receive short ban for your actions as this is the third time you’ve broken 3.4 recently. Please use this time to go over the rules, especially 3.4.

@Skript Could you please explain your actions here? Please respond within 24 hours or this action request will be accepted.

If you think certain rules should be changed to facilitate this, maybe consider making a suggestion to change these?

Next time you do this you're getting banned. Refer back to what I said in your previous thread, this is for server ban/blacklist disputes, you are blacklisted from plpd.online, @McGlinchy asked you to pack it in and be patient and then contact him after a few weeks. Closed

Description of the idea: Very minor addition but essentially, when you attach an ACOG or use a gun with an ACOG, have the iron sight as the default setting. (At the moment the ACOG scope is default and you have to swap if you want to use the iron sights) Why should this be added? (pros): Makes...

The forums are not the place to appeal PLPD punishments. Wait a few weeks before talking to @McGlinchy again or you probably aren't gonna be allowed back. Be patient. Closed.

SA clarified this with us during the first week of June, you're free to make another dispute but I can't recommend it'll be accepted as that happened a few months before this clarification.

I think all of you have failed to see or have just blindly ignored my quotation marks. This is against the rules but SA's decision is that bhopping and other similar movements are 'allowed' as it cannot be consistently enforced at the moment. Which is why I'm suggesting you lot make server...

This is only 'allowed' at the moment as it's literally not enforceable consistently at all. There have been some updates to prevent people from taking advantage of this such as your aim going through the roof when jumping and other things, but it would probably be best to suggest server updates...

Pretty sure @Carrot was teasing something similar to this

Although you've got your point across fairly well, do try to stick to this please and follow the template provided: https://perpheads.com/threads/how-to-make-a-ban-dispute.38374/

I can't remember how exactly it functions but iirc something like this is already implemented, right? And there's also TFU policy limiting the number of people that can be geared up, excluding life threatening events