Search results

You can’t ad hoc your own terms onto rule 3.4, if it only says it’s valid to kill police to prevent discovery. It does not specify whether it has to be in a property or not, to claim otherwise would require proof and that burden is on you. No that’s illogical because it’s an obvious false...

Repeating the same argument doesn’t make it any less incorrect. I refuted it already with a literal quote from rule 3.4

Sometimes the brute may speak words in your ear saying “run them over, run them over,” but you shouldn’t listen. Hopefully that’s fixed in V6.1

Source: trust me bro

welcome

welcome

This is illogical because it’s a slippery slope. Not everyone under GP is thinking to respond to an convenient Org chat or quick typer to the level of writing detailed comms to counter play while breaching 3.4 If someone accidentally clicks one of those keys, they could’ve just as easily...