Search results

After reviewing their demo @xlduz did not see anyone armed when the door opened. They are either attempting to deceive me in this action request or remembering incorrectly due to panic and the small fraction of time they reacted in game. As rule 2.5 states the following below, @xlduz was in...

I’ve requested your demo in regards to this, please accept the prompt next time you get on the server.

So you never saw anyone armed before shooting?

If you want to you can, but I want to see what @xlduz has to say first

Do you have a clip of this possibly?

Also @RespectMyVoid did you and jack open the door and see this person or did the door remained closed the entire time before they started firing?

@xlduz explain your actions here, why did you start shooting through the door during this raid? I’ll give you 42 hours to respond.

Given how well of an apology you’ve made, I’ll accept this. If you break 3.4 again there is no telling how long your next ban will be, so I suggest you be extra careful as you are on thin ice.

After additional evidence was given, the player broke 3.4 in another situation and will be issued a 1 day ban. Logs show the player's intentions were clear here. I will add this to the ban reasoning, as they were attempting to execute you for some reason as an officer. Reviewed with @Lucius Husky

If you have an issue with the ban length, you need to open a staff complaint here. Since you’ve admitted you did do it, the punishment is valid. We do not handle ban length times in disputes, only the validity of the punishment.

@ISOMIES will receive a 3-day ban for 3.20. Logs are clear they went to store your items instantly, then disconnected less than 5 minutes after they mugged you. The user was most likely just trying to avoid confrontation with you afterwards, 3.18 will be left out due to lack of evidence however...

Handled in-game

So you never actually even entered the property or try to?

Did you attempt to rob the place he was breaking into, or did you just steal his items and be on your way? Did you also, by chance, own or know the players who were basing where he had raided?

@S-A-T had fracket not already finished their raid? How would you consider this countering them if they already raided it and were in the process of leaving? I’d also like to know how specifically you knew they were the ones who had raided, a suspicion is not a confirmation. Apologize for the...

They disconnected at 12:45:27 PM (EST) and had stole items off you at 12:39:54 PM (EST) @ISOMIES Why did you disconnect 5 minutes after mugging @MJ. ? I’ll give you 24 hours to respond.

User has no forum account and it’s abundantly clear this was a violation of 3.4 after checking logs. They will be issued a day ban.

@S-A-T explain/justify why you stole Frackets AK-101 and crowbar here. You have 42 hours to reply or this will be handled without your input.

User will be banned for 2.5, 1.6, and 3.15 for 2 weeks as they have received recent punishments for 3.15 and 2.5. This was clearly intentional and they did not completely tell me the truth in the report in-game. You had the wrong player listed in this action request. I've updated the info. Here...

Should be perpheads_demo_2026-1-27 20-47-14 near the end of the demo

The user claimed in a in-game report, that you died from the common car physics flipping out when you walk between the sidewalk and the front of a car. I checked logs and saw you were ran over at 3 mph so this may be true, given this info do you want to continue this action request or do you...

That's exactly why I am denying this, I appreciate the apology but with your record you ought to be happy I only issued you a 4 day ban. It was extremely lenient given the fact.

@grok Simplify the rules even further like I am 6 years old and don't know basic grammar in the English language

You've barely committed any infractions as of late. Please be more careful. I appreciate you owning up to the fact that you jumped the gun here. I trust you'll make better decisions going forward. Your ban will be lifted.

This action request is mainly considering Mak and not pug's actions @Mak Needlesley escalated this situation, @Tomura clearly stated the reason for the stop was your reckless driving, and had mentioned nothing about the body yet. @Tomura also stated when you were being stopped, you would be...

@Mak responded in discord. @Tomura Was the body Mak run over already dead to your knowledge, or was it unconscious? Did you intend on detaining mak and investigating the DNA on the body before arresting them?

From @Pugga 's POV, it seems they had reason to take action here. I am more so concerned with the fact @Mak spawned from dying, then went AFK for about 32 minutes, then killed no one up until this interaction from what I can see in logs. @Mak Could you please explain why you told @Pugga you...

The punishment for rule 3.4 is extremely valid in this case. You completely ignored gunpoint twice, and for a significant time. The ban reasoning will be amended to reflect this. The reason the ban reason did not reflect this is most likely because more evidence of a second situation you were...

Ban expired