- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Punishment Type: Ban
Punishment Subtype: Server Ban
Appeal Type: Apology
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @Acerius
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 5 Days
Your Steam Name: FullOmnivore
Your Roleplay Name: Lawrence Dickinson
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:563019758
Why were you punished?: 1.6, 2.5 - User got his friend to bait an occupant of Wood Cabins 2 via friendly social engineering to the Forest Rest Stop, where they had staged a car and the scenario that they couldn't fuel it. Once the occupant - who was not not known to be armed and had no visible weaponry - was in the middle of refuelling the car, the user then sniped him from behind a tree where the occupant had not been threatened nor given any orders to comply under gunpoint. This was also way too far from the property to be considered a valid initiation tactic. The user left with a report open on them, and they knew the report was being processed as they acknowledged it, but failed to answer further questions and instead continued playing.
Why should this appeal be considered?: I'm unbanned tomorrow, I did break the rules and avoid the report because I knew I was in the wrong. I apologise for this and it wont happen again, I done it because me and my friend was attempting to raid but didn't take into account any rules.
I apologise to Acerius for making things longer than they had to be as well, as things may have been resolved easier in the report
Additional Information: I'm appealing a day before I'm unbanned cos lowkey got nothing to play since been banned
Punishment Subtype: Server Ban
Appeal Type: Apology
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @Acerius
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 5 Days
Your Steam Name: FullOmnivore
Your Roleplay Name: Lawrence Dickinson
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:563019758
Why were you punished?: 1.6, 2.5 - User got his friend to bait an occupant of Wood Cabins 2 via friendly social engineering to the Forest Rest Stop, where they had staged a car and the scenario that they couldn't fuel it. Once the occupant - who was not not known to be armed and had no visible weaponry - was in the middle of refuelling the car, the user then sniped him from behind a tree where the occupant had not been threatened nor given any orders to comply under gunpoint. This was also way too far from the property to be considered a valid initiation tactic. The user left with a report open on them, and they knew the report was being processed as they acknowledged it, but failed to answer further questions and instead continued playing.
Why should this appeal be considered?: I'm unbanned tomorrow, I did break the rules and avoid the report because I knew I was in the wrong. I apologise for this and it wont happen again, I done it because me and my friend was attempting to raid but didn't take into account any rules.
I apologise to Acerius for making things longer than they had to be as well, as things may have been resolved easier in the report
Additional Information: I'm appealing a day before I'm unbanned cos lowkey got nothing to play since been banned
