Ban Dispute (ThePeak)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Points
155
Punishment Type: Ban
Punishment Subtype: Server Ban
Appeal Type: Dispute[Evidence]
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @ThePeak
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 5 Days

Your Steam Name: perkyrata
Your Roleplay Name: Gustavo Escalfado
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:633716641

Why were you punished?: 3.4 - User repeatedly went back into a shootout because he wanted to collect his PPS order

Why should this appeal be considered?: Hello,
To begin with, I didn't pretend to do anything against the rules, I just wanted to get my PPS package, I don't thing my position while I was killed was inside the shoutout. I was in my car, when it broke, a man told me to leave, I left, I went upstairs and I was searching something in google when a man told me to leave again (while I was in the bussiness plaza) I followed his instructions, (I had already done a deliver for my shop in bazaar) and I decided to go to the PPS thinking that if I were in warehouse I wouldn't get killed because I didn't consider the PPS warehouse as the "shoutout", I came there, I was looking for some things in F1 and went AFK for 1 minute outside PPS. I came back to AFK and a man killed me. I created a report and that's all what happened.
Finally, I would like to say why I don't consider it's fair to get banned. It wasn't my intention to do anything against the shoutout, neither the defenders nor the raiders. I don't think my location when I got killed could bother or disturb any raider or influence the shoutout. I hope you read this and take into account my words. Thank you for your attention.
Gustavo, good person, better man.
 


You were aware of the shootout and was given plenty of warnings to leave. Staying in a close vicinity to the shootout was a poor choice. As a result, you dying is completely justified, seeing as you disregarded your safety and failed to cooperate with reasonable orders.

Taking all of this into consideration, we strongly believe this is a valid 3.4 ban.

Reviewed with @Galle, @Acerius, @RespectMyVoid, and @Lhealey05
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top