- Messages
- 353
- Reaction score
- 416
- Points
- 505
Appealing for: Ban
Appeal type: Dispute
Which staff member banned you: (See: ScamBans) @Code Monkey
Your Steam Name: tetra
Your In-game Name: Riley west
Your Steam ID:
Why were you banned?: (See: ScamBans) jumped to conclusions
Why do you feel the ban's invalid?:
I believe this ban is invalid due to the fact of before I proceeded I asked the other officers if they also heard the door rattle. This was confirmed by an officer called Amelia hence why we proceeded. When I asked if someone heard the door rattle (Bram the officer who tried to open the door but never spoke up once) should have said it was him and this would have never happened or occurred.
you can clearly hear in the video from another officer “someone is definitely in there”
And agian “pretty sure someone else is in there” I only proceeded once this was confirmed so unsure how I broke the law
You can clearly also hear me say “might have been wrong might have been hearing things. But only proceeded once Amelia confirmed she also heard something
Additional Comment(s): I find it really funny that the evidence provided once agian from this user flash forwarded over all this extra information about Amelia ectera. Seems really convenient .
Evidence (Required for all server bans):
Appeal type: Dispute
Which staff member banned you: (See: ScamBans) @Code Monkey
Your Steam Name: tetra
Your In-game Name: Riley west
Your Steam ID:
Why were you banned?: (See: ScamBans) jumped to conclusions
Why do you feel the ban's invalid?:
I believe this ban is invalid due to the fact of before I proceeded I asked the other officers if they also heard the door rattle. This was confirmed by an officer called Amelia hence why we proceeded. When I asked if someone heard the door rattle (Bram the officer who tried to open the door but never spoke up once) should have said it was him and this would have never happened or occurred.
you can clearly hear in the video from another officer “someone is definitely in there”
And agian “pretty sure someone else is in there” I only proceeded once this was confirmed so unsure how I broke the law
You can clearly also hear me say “might have been wrong might have been hearing things. But only proceeded once Amelia confirmed she also heard something
Additional Comment(s): I find it really funny that the evidence provided once agian from this user flash forwarded over all this extra information about Amelia ectera. Seems really convenient .
Evidence (Required for all server bans):
Last edited: