- Staff
- #1
Is this a new law or a change to a current law:
New law
What law do you wish to change/add:
9.X: Reckless Endangerment
Any person(s) who’s actions put another person(s) at serious risk of harm and / or death are guilty of this offence, regardless of if the Endangered person(s) are harmed or not, or if they’re willingly participating in these actions.
Felony: Liable to 4 years imprisonment and $4000 maximum fine and asset forfeiture (vehicles, weapons, etc)
Why should this change/addition be made:
The following scenarios this law can be violated include:
Reckless driving, DUI, and other serious vehicle related crimes that could end in fatalities if the driver has passengers in their vehicle, or drove in this manner causing traffic accidents whilst either evading police, street racing, or performing another voluntary motor vehicle involved crime where other people were at high risk of being harmed.
Causing an explosion in a public, residential, or government building / area.
Throwing the suburbs baby into a road
Having people stand on your vehicle, or stand / sit inside the back of a pickup truck as you drive on the highway.
Intentionally causing a firework to explode in public on the ground.
Attempting to shoot a prop off of your friends head
Causing the injury of an LEO unwillingly, by putting the LEO in a position where they can fall, get struck by a car, etc. (Running on foot down the highway / on the monorail tracks attempting to avoid the LEO)
Hosting a fight club
Leaving someone on the highway, as civilian, LEO, and government employee, if they got out of your vehicle.
Currently reckless endangerment would be better than the officers who used to enforce “attempted manslaughter” as an actual possibility.
What is the aim of this change/addition:
To criminalise endangerment further allowing police officers to maintain and keep the peace further.
New law
What law do you wish to change/add:
9.X: Reckless Endangerment
Any person(s) who’s actions put another person(s) at serious risk of harm and / or death are guilty of this offence, regardless of if the Endangered person(s) are harmed or not, or if they’re willingly participating in these actions.
Felony: Liable to 4 years imprisonment and $4000 maximum fine and asset forfeiture (vehicles, weapons, etc)
Why should this change/addition be made:
The following scenarios this law can be violated include:
Reckless driving, DUI, and other serious vehicle related crimes that could end in fatalities if the driver has passengers in their vehicle, or drove in this manner causing traffic accidents whilst either evading police, street racing, or performing another voluntary motor vehicle involved crime where other people were at high risk of being harmed.
Causing an explosion in a public, residential, or government building / area.
Having people stand on your vehicle, or stand / sit inside the back of a pickup truck as you drive on the highway.
Intentionally causing a firework to explode in public on the ground.
Attempting to shoot a prop off of your friends head
Causing the injury of an LEO unwillingly, by putting the LEO in a position where they can fall, get struck by a car, etc. (Running on foot down the highway / on the monorail tracks attempting to avoid the LEO)
Hosting a fight club
Leaving someone on the highway, as civilian, LEO, and government employee, if they got out of your vehicle.
Currently reckless endangerment would be better than the officers who used to enforce “attempted manslaughter” as an actual possibility.
What is the aim of this change/addition:
To criminalise endangerment further allowing police officers to maintain and keep the peace further.
Last edited: