Recent content by Tilin

User was not overly reckless (clearly a mistake) and accidents happen, which is part of roleplay. You are not entitled to a refund just because your car was wrecked - that defeats the purpose of that mechanic.

This has been previously discussed alongside smokes. It's been kind of established we don't like the idea that they'd essentially go through a wall, so you could throw it outside of a room and it would still spread inside

As much as I agree with some of everyone's points, I'll play the devil's advocate for a moment: These clips being posted publicly and shared, sometimes makes people believe that those actions are okay - sometimes they even end up being used as references within reports to show "But this person...

We obviously can't just forbid players from making reports against someone, because they weren't directly involved in the situation. "muh immersion" being ruined is enough to report it for such. Oftentimes the reported players also make no attempt to do the messing about in an area that is away...

User will serve a 1-day ban for their actions.

@D3adlyMachin3 can you explain why you shot @Brian Hickman and why you pulled a weapon when getting gunpointed? You have 72 hours to provide your side of the story.

There's just one issue. We rarely act on behalf of another user without a report, especially when it comes to 2.5. So the argument that if consent is there this would be less of an issue isn't exactly the problem. With what you mentioned with SS and the mayor, the actual issue there is that...

I think the pure mingery that would come from this is enough for me to say no to. That apart from the fact that grenades as they are, are already OP enough, they don't need the ability to be used as bait.

Okay Dexter... But genuienly how many times IN LIFE will you have to drag 10 bodies around (You have the right to remain silent btw)

Users are expected to not put their life at risk needlessly, which is why rule 3.4 was initially violated. Standing around a shootout you have no involvement in or benefit from staying in harm's way is the definition of it. That includes picking up a gun in a shootout you're uninvolved in. In...

-ish @Clarky will receive a warning for their comment, however we recognize it was said as a comment that wasn't well thought through, due to the situation, which put him under stress. @St. ides, we, however do not appreciate you interracting with people in a hostile manner to bait a reaction...

Whilst we have decided to deny this dispute, because it falls under the rule, I will still explain as to why this was the case. To start off with how the rules are written: Some rules may provide examples that are common, however they do not state every example, as that list would be rather...

There is nothing to disagree with.. I didn't say I am in favor of this either. Just because it's automatic doesn't mean people won't intentionally turn them of and instead of ignoring every car, you'll now specifically look for those who made a mistake or intentionally turned them off.

I think that's precisely the point. People make too much money from drugs, not too little. If anything the drugs will be reworked to result in lower yields. That is precisely how it works in real life - most newer cars do it automatically for you. You just don't drive around with brights, which...

Would be cool if you could send them via text messages too ngl