-ish
The users will not be punished for 3.4 as their decision to comply with gunpoint would've resulted in certain death beyond any reasonable doubt on their part.
They will however both receive a warning for rule 2.1 - Play Realistically. The server as of right now does not offer a feature...
You could make players race against one another to complete these missions.
Like he only appears a few times per day, but gives a good payout to only 1 player.
Another good Crackhead Benji suggestion!
I think Benji's opinion points everything out. There's a reason we've got limited powers. There could always be more smods, but that comes with time and trust.
Suggestion Topic: Other
Suggestion Description: Raiding definition should receive a clearer definition on what is considered a raid in progress.
Current Definition:
Trespassing on an occupied property with the intention of stealing from it or its occupants or killing the players inside.
It...
Hi,
so the complaint is that a reprimand given by @Apo_llo was false. If that's the case head over to https://plpd.online/helpdesk/create and create a helpdesk ticket with the Office of Professional Standards (PSD). You will need to provide evidence of some sort (such as when the incident you...
Speaks for itself:
And please be honest the first time with us, not once you know there's no way out:
User will receive a 1 day ban for their actions - Rule 3.3 - Realistic Actions
Amended: Upon further review of the AR, it was found that the player did not violate any rules that would've resulted in the loss of your weapon(s).
Reviewed with @Collier and @Acerius.
As the player is currently banned and the weapon cannot be retrieved in the moment, create an F6 in-game to...
I'm no expert here, but I'm certain Church isn't below Regals.
@Mailman_allen Do you wish to correct your statement? Otherwise I'll confirm with the demo to see what exactly you were trying to achieve there.