- Messages
- 624
- Reaction score
- 1,133
- Points
- 750
Is this a new law or a change to a current law: Change
What law do you wish to change/add:
Remove the punishments listed under these laws:
Why should this change/addition be made: These laws are not actual criminal offenses, but are legal justifications exonerating people from other criminal offenses. Therefore, having punishments makes no sense and only serves to confuse, as if someone is not properly abiding by either of these laws then the legal exemption is void and they can be charged with the original offense, be it brandishing/possessing an offensive weapon.
What is the aim of this change/addition: Removes two frequently mis-issued punishments, reduces ambiguity and complexity, brings laws in line with other laws of its type (similar to laws 2.2 Necessity and 4.3 Exemption from Law).
Additional Information: Another solution for this would be incorporating laws 7.6 and 7.7 into the existing laws for 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5, allowing them to be removed entirely.
What law do you wish to change/add:
Remove the punishments listed under these laws:
7.6 Transport of Offensive Weapons
A person does not act unlawfully under articles 7.3, 7.4 or 7.5 if they are transporting an offensive weapon in a way that is direct and immediate between places of secure storage, such as a vehicle trunk or storage chest.
Misdemeanor - liable to 2 years maximum imprisonment, $3,000 maximum fine and asset forfeiture.
7.7 Sale of Offensive Weapons
A person does not commit an offence under articles 7.4 or 7.5 if the offensive weapon in question is stored or displayed within a property defined by the banks of Paralake City as being a Shop or Business. In addition to this, the offensive weapon in question must be intended for sale to the general public, it must not be being held by any person and must not intended to assist in the committing of any criminal offence.
Infraction - liable to $2,000 maximum fine.
Why should this change/addition be made: These laws are not actual criminal offenses, but are legal justifications exonerating people from other criminal offenses. Therefore, having punishments makes no sense and only serves to confuse, as if someone is not properly abiding by either of these laws then the legal exemption is void and they can be charged with the original offense, be it brandishing/possessing an offensive weapon.
What is the aim of this change/addition: Removes two frequently mis-issued punishments, reduces ambiguity and complexity, brings laws in line with other laws of its type (similar to laws 2.2 Necessity and 4.3 Exemption from Law).
Additional Information: Another solution for this would be incorporating laws 7.6 and 7.7 into the existing laws for 7.3, 7.4, and 7.5, allowing them to be removed entirely.