- Messages
- 8
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 45
Punishment Type: Ban
Punishment Subtype: Server Ban
Appeal Type: Dispute[Evidence]
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @Lhealey05
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 5 Days
Your Steam Name: syxeri
Your Roleplay Name: Martin Roger
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:151731
Why were you punished?: "3.4 - User killed someone infront of a TFO getting them self killed"
Why should this appeal be considered?: Evidence 2 (chat with Lhealey05): https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/ksU6SLU79xYXcMgMK?invite=cr-MSxreXcsMzMyODU4MzMz
As you can see I've been banned for killing someone in front of a TFO. I had reason, the gentlemen I shot in the video killed my friend. A member of my organisation who I value, so I killed him. May I first point out that the man in the video shot my friend in front of the TFO first, and he has gone unpunished. Is this also not 3.4? The man had no reason to kill my friend from my knowledge.
Secondly, I wasn't under the impression you could not kill in front of police officers. I understand now how that breaks 3.4 but I was unaware of this until now. I feel a 5 day ban is ridiculous because of my "really bad record". This is because the last time I was banned was also for 3.4, and this ban was also extended because megasaw said " // Ban length due to horrible 3.4 history". I understand that I may have broken 3.4 a few times in the past and that's on me. But I dealt with those punishments by having to wait a week to play again when I didn't comply with gunpoint. People get 12 hours for the same ban. Fair enough due to, like he said, terrible history. Since then I have received only ONE other 3.4 warning and it was for running across the intersection. Didn't know this was 3.4 but after the warning I have not done it since. So why I am now having another extended ban for history that has already been punished for seems unfair and unjust. Now what I find absolutely ridiculous is that while I was having a discussion with Lhealey05 about this trying to explain what had happened and informing him that I'd already received extended ban lengths due to my history and trying to explain the situation, he just banned me without responding. If I'd already been punished for the bad history, does this mean that for every 3.4 break I will receive an even bigger punishment? This seems completely unfair, people break 3.4 all the time whether by mistake or on purpose. The fact that this honest mistake has resulted in a longer ban than deserved and left the other people involved who also broke the rules completely unpunished is disgusting. I want to have a personal chat with this "Lhealey05" and sort this out because he has acted completely out of order.
Additional Information: Lhealey05 acted really irresponsibly when dealing with me. He was extremely unprofessional and didn't even bother listening to my side of the story. The proof is all there, you can look through it and I personally believe that he should be spoken to in regards to how he dealt with the situation so he can improve for situations in the future. It's not fair to silence someone when dealing with a situation by banning them without hearing what they have to say.
Punishment Subtype: Server Ban
Appeal Type: Dispute[Evidence]
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @Lhealey05
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 5 Days
Your Steam Name: syxeri
Your Roleplay Name: Martin Roger
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:151731
Why were you punished?: "3.4 - User killed someone infront of a TFO getting them self killed"
Why should this appeal be considered?: Evidence 2 (chat with Lhealey05): https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/ksU6SLU79xYXcMgMK?invite=cr-MSxreXcsMzMyODU4MzMz
As you can see I've been banned for killing someone in front of a TFO. I had reason, the gentlemen I shot in the video killed my friend. A member of my organisation who I value, so I killed him. May I first point out that the man in the video shot my friend in front of the TFO first, and he has gone unpunished. Is this also not 3.4? The man had no reason to kill my friend from my knowledge.
Secondly, I wasn't under the impression you could not kill in front of police officers. I understand now how that breaks 3.4 but I was unaware of this until now. I feel a 5 day ban is ridiculous because of my "really bad record". This is because the last time I was banned was also for 3.4, and this ban was also extended because megasaw said " // Ban length due to horrible 3.4 history". I understand that I may have broken 3.4 a few times in the past and that's on me. But I dealt with those punishments by having to wait a week to play again when I didn't comply with gunpoint. People get 12 hours for the same ban. Fair enough due to, like he said, terrible history. Since then I have received only ONE other 3.4 warning and it was for running across the intersection. Didn't know this was 3.4 but after the warning I have not done it since. So why I am now having another extended ban for history that has already been punished for seems unfair and unjust. Now what I find absolutely ridiculous is that while I was having a discussion with Lhealey05 about this trying to explain what had happened and informing him that I'd already received extended ban lengths due to my history and trying to explain the situation, he just banned me without responding. If I'd already been punished for the bad history, does this mean that for every 3.4 break I will receive an even bigger punishment? This seems completely unfair, people break 3.4 all the time whether by mistake or on purpose. The fact that this honest mistake has resulted in a longer ban than deserved and left the other people involved who also broke the rules completely unpunished is disgusting. I want to have a personal chat with this "Lhealey05" and sort this out because he has acted completely out of order.
Additional Information: Lhealey05 acted really irresponsibly when dealing with me. He was extremely unprofessional and didn't even bother listening to my side of the story. The proof is all there, you can look through it and I personally believe that he should be spoken to in regards to how he dealt with the situation so he can improve for situations in the future. It's not fair to silence someone when dealing with a situation by banning them without hearing what they have to say.
