Map Suggestion Further fix/adjust traffic signs

Messages
689
Reaction score
1,308
Points
780
Suggestion Title: Further fix/adjust traffic signs
Suggestion Description:
Fix the following sign conflicts where two different speed limits apply for the same stretch of road:

-2601.422363 8509.499023 1380.031250
30 MPH sign on SAINT ROCK ST conflicts with 40 MPH speed limit from cross street CREED ST, OAK HILL, and CITY JUNCTION

-8739.734375 210.095016 1096.031250
30 MPH sign on SUNSET AV conflicts with 40 MPH speed limit from cross street FICKLESTEIN WY

-6777.162109 16048.785156 1284.489014
30 MPH sign in SHADY TUNNEL conflicts with 40 MPH speed limit from highways and STATION HILL

Additional note for all highway on-ramps:
Consider moving the highway 80 MPH signs from the end of the on-ramps (where the highway merges at high speed) to the start of the ramp so that vehicles can build up speed on the approach. This is how it is done in most countries. See image:

VVSq1tr.jpeg



Why should this be added?:
Removes conflict with ambiguous/duplicate speed limits meaning that two different speed limits apply to the same stretches of road.
Removes vehicles being legally required to perform dangerous merges at 40 MPH.

What negatives could this have?:
None (for real this time)

What problem would this suggestion solve?: Conflict with ambiguous/duplicate speed limits meaning that two different speed limits apply to the same stretches of road. Vehicles legally required to perform dangerous merges at 40 MPH.

Useful Images:
 
Makes sense to me, especially the on ramp thing. Merging into 80mph traffic at 40mph isa bad idea and could cause injury/death. Building up speed in order to get onto the highway just makes sense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
513
  • Locked
  • Suggestion Suggestion
Server Suggestion Variable Lane Signs
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Locked
  • Suggestion Suggestion
Map Suggestion Highway changes
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Locked
  • Suggestion Suggestion
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top