- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 10
Punishment Type: Ban
Punishment Subtype: Server Ban
Appeal Type: Apology
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @sza
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 1 Day
Your Steam Name: King
Your Roleplay Name: Dylan Harvey
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:224313398
Why were you punished?: 3.4, 3.21 | User failed to comply with gunpoint by a group of raiders instead citing that it was "FailRP" in response through local chat
Why should this appeal be considered?: I fully accept that I made mistakes during the gunpoint situation, as I failed to comply due to misunderstanding how gunpoint rules work on the server as a new player. I understand now that I should have complied and raised concerns afterwards rather than resisting, and I apologise for that.
However, I would like to dispute part of the reasoning, as I believe the situation in the Tidals corridor was not clearly explained to me at the time, and I was left confused about why it was considered valid. I felt I was trying to understand the rules during the report, but did not receive a clear breakdown that I could understand as a new player.
Additionally, I noticed that part of the ban reason appears to reference behaviour that was already previously addressed with a warning (the earlier raid-related incident). I believed that matter had already been resolved separately.
I am not trying to avoid responsibility for my actions, but I would like a fair review of whether the ban is based solely on the gunpoint incident or whether it includes prior behaviour that was already handled with a warning.
I apologise for my mistakes and I am now clear on how I should handle similar situations in future. I am respectfully requesting reconsideration of the ban duration or outcome given my status as a new player and the confusion involved.
Additional Information: Void issued the warn I received.
Punishment Subtype: Server Ban
Appeal Type: Apology
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @sza
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 1 Day
Your Steam Name: King
Your Roleplay Name: Dylan Harvey
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:224313398
Why were you punished?: 3.4, 3.21 | User failed to comply with gunpoint by a group of raiders instead citing that it was "FailRP" in response through local chat
Why should this appeal be considered?: I fully accept that I made mistakes during the gunpoint situation, as I failed to comply due to misunderstanding how gunpoint rules work on the server as a new player. I understand now that I should have complied and raised concerns afterwards rather than resisting, and I apologise for that.
However, I would like to dispute part of the reasoning, as I believe the situation in the Tidals corridor was not clearly explained to me at the time, and I was left confused about why it was considered valid. I felt I was trying to understand the rules during the report, but did not receive a clear breakdown that I could understand as a new player.
Additionally, I noticed that part of the ban reason appears to reference behaviour that was already previously addressed with a warning (the earlier raid-related incident). I believed that matter had already been resolved separately.
I am not trying to avoid responsibility for my actions, but I would like a fair review of whether the ban is based solely on the gunpoint incident or whether it includes prior behaviour that was already handled with a warning.
I apologise for my mistakes and I am now clear on how I should handle similar situations in future. I am respectfully requesting reconsideration of the ban duration or outcome given my status as a new player and the confusion involved.
Additional Information: Void issued the warn I received.
