Search results

Esepen has not replied to the thread and was given plenty of time to accept my steam friend request which they didn't do, as such I will continue with the AR. Esepen will be receiving a warning for 3.4 and 3.9.

Also added esepen on steam seeing as they haven't been on the forums in quite a few years.

3.3 has been looked at a bit more lenient lately and we try to allow a bit more movement actions since there is gameplay mechanics in place to already slow you down and make sprint jumping in combat a bit harder. Therefor, this is fine and no rule was broken.

@garrosh can you explain your actions?

@esepen1 can you explain your actions, why did you run from the police? And why did you go to respawn your car in the middle of a chase?

I have unbanned you, please keep in mind that near- future 3.4 breaks will guarantee more, and longer bans being issued. Have fun.

Since they have been online on the server since I contacted them but still failed to accept my friend request I will resume with this AR as normal. Evolve is currently already banned for 2.5 and also disconnecting while a report was open, for such their ban will be extended from 5 days to 2...

@Crunchie what I meant with being so close is that you could've waited in the pub or in a place with more cover, yet your plans are valid and you were far away to safely observe the situation without involving yourself. Since you were also already there it was indeed safer to wait it out...

Since they do not have a forum account I will attempt to contact them on steam.

I do not believe 3.4 was violated to an extend where punishment would be sufficient here. The officers were not instructed originally to wait for you to leave, so they weren't in the wrong for thinking u were actually leaving, as you should have done. Instead of taking the piss and going for a...

@Crunchie can you explain what you were doing in the provided evidence, and why you were staying this close to an on-going shootout?

I appreciate the apology and your honesty, it goes a long way. But unbanning you or shortening this ban wouldn't be fair currently. Your record for 3.4 especially recently is just very terrible. + you made this apology only 5 days after your ban was issued. Wait a few more days out from now on...

The return no one needed nor wanted :facepalm:

It is clear that the first person to exit the car @lewis dad was under clear gunpoint from atleast the TFU officer and shortly after the officer infront of him aswell. As such this is a clear violation of 3.4. The part for @Pen Piza is a bit more difficult, as technically the officers...

Closed until dealt with.

Please provide this at your earliest convenience.

@lewis dad @Pen Piza can you both explain your actions presented in the clip?

- 1x AK-47 - 1x Full AK-47 Magazine - 1x 101 Stock Your AK did not have a reflex sight in the clip.

Well, atleast now we know how long it takes to read the new rules @Collier. But because of the effort put in I'll be so kind to accept this and unban you, but keep your record clean and show me good things, don't make me regret it.

You did kinda say this to me 3x already while and after your apology was denied :confused:

I think you should wait your ban out a bit, I appreciate the apology and effort put into it, but your recent record doesn't show your confidence in the rules.

Minors play on here, be glad its only 1 day.

Only when you apply, so we can all make fun of you

We had a small chat about this between a few staff members and the conclusion was that Sorle had every right to defend themselves as it was clear that the people approaching him had other intentions than just passing by. For @Jay Blak, you cannot initiate a mugging on someone that is holding a...

@Jay Blak can you explain your actions? @Sorle why did you open fire before knowing their intentions?

I had a detailed chat with Pedro, I explained 3.4 to him as he says he didnt quite understand it yet. Though Pedro has a recent 1 week ban for the same rule, so another ban will be issued lasting 3 days, this as he seems apologetic and the situation you were in @Sorle wasn't affected too much by...

hi