Search results

Wow, I'm impressed. I don't condone what you did and even despise it, but the video was very well done. It was very interesting how it was put like a mind-battle between you and Tiny, as you pulled off the corrupted demos and the PC breaking down bit but you ended up getting caught in the final...

Great update, but I do not like the fishing, I preferred the scuba diving alternative. Makes it seem OP to get money through fish + possibility of finding guns. I just think it would've been more realistic, put the swimming skill to use and I for one don't want to get any fish.

I speak french fluently and in everyday life for about 8 years now.

profile picture checks out

No one said anything about being sorry. It's about not doing it again. A person can hate the rules and every single person on the server yet still behave in order to avoid punishment. I don't like the term "teaching a lesson", but if you haven't changed your behavior as you claim, why have you...

Caring about not being able to play = Caring about the punishment Punishment doesn't have to be consciously acknowledged for it to make an effect on you. A user saying he "doesn't care" about punishment doesn't matter and in most cases he will attempt to change his behavior IF he actually cares...

Let me start off by saying that it doesn't matter what you did with your server in regards to PERP's rules. Good for you that your server was different. A lot of you like to say "what is the problem if it doesn't affect anyone else?" however the concept of affecting others can be tricky. The...

Contrary to popular opinion, not affecting others negatively is not an excuse or free pass to break the rules. I think they would've had a lighter punishment if they had not disconnected. Your proposal of a verbal warning through steam is unrealistic for multiple reasons: 1.- No guarantee that...

Yes because PERP community is a hivemind and if a few fellas want the rules to be less strict it's contradictory for me to open this discussion /sarcasm Your comment makes no sense

Can we have some real enforcement on breach of 2.9 in certain cases? I'm talking handing out warnings. To be more specific, I'm talking about the "/help" function. The reasoning is simple, if someone is asking for help you don't use /help to respond with the dumbest, cringiest joke that no one...

You got bamboozled, but you can still use demos... right?

Even if the above is true (which I'm not sure), It makes more sense to me that they would get bandages from a facility that is designed to all medical treatment rather than the Police Department. They should spawn with it when on-duty. It's a quality of life kind of thing.

I don't understand. You're either saying that if I'm not responding to a life-threatening emergency I'm stripped of Emergency Vehicle definition (A) or that I'm in a vehicle that is designed to respond to life-threatening emergencies (B). A: Bad B: The life-threatening part is still...

I would remove the life threatening situation part. If there was a carjack going on I still respond Code 3 but no one's life is really at risk, just any emergency is fine.

Just lie. Just from one word you destroyed your entire statement yourself.

What did you correct? I was responding to this:

Here we go again.

But that's interpreting the law how you want to. Common sense doesn't override the law, if it says "Cause injury" then you shouldn't charge someone for it if they didn't cause any injuries.

Actually, I retract my comments and I'm in support of amending the law. One simple reason for it: If we don't change it, imagine this: - Shootout in bazaar, 5 criminals vs 8 cops, all criminals are shot down and one is revived - Revived Criminal who likes to find loopholes in the law: "Do you...

And that's how I think it should be, I don't think people need to have a higher sentence when they didn't injure anyone. If you think attempting injury and actually causing injury should have the same potential punishments, then attempted murder and actual murder should too, which is not the case.

This issue here is why in some jurisdictions Assault and Battery are combined in a single offence while in others it's separated. Battery always implies unwanted physical contact. For example, 9.1 doesn't cover battery (since it doesn't cause injury) but 9.3 does if you are pushed against your...

The way I see it, it's already there: 6.7 Attempting or planning a crime of 9.2 if the person swings, shoots at you but misses, 4y 3,5k max 9.3 If for example a person approaches you with a baseball bat while saying "You know I can fuck you up in 2 seconds right?" You can't say it's physical...

I also want to point out something that came to my mind recently (and thus I didnt post it in the discussion thread): I think a lot of people get scared by the "+40$ per 100 meters" on the taxi fare. They think the money is going to be drained like mad. So maybe another possibility would be for...

we need PERP boxing matches divided into strength categories instead of weight

Logan got roasted to hell for that, KSI's ego is astronomical and barely gets any shit for it although I want him to win bc I see the paul's as the bigger idiots

CodezBlack: I find Children is more appropriate.

can someone dropkick jake paul's GF like she be lookin like an alien, tf is that makeup homie I WANNA THANK MY BEAUTIFUL GIRLFRIEND BTW

who is that milf in UFCx i've seen her before