Search results

Hi, sorry for not reaching out, I didn't realise you were on the server. This was an old incident https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/lTpamf7zljZwYhS3X?invite=cr-MSxDbTcsMTk5MTg0NDcx&v=170

Perhaps you'd have been less confused and gotten a shorter ban if you hadn't disconnected from the server while Lewis was still talking to you. You've been punished 5 times in the last 10 days for breaking the rules, how often should we have let you get away with it before banning you for a...

Whereas we, as a Senior Management team, maintain that using any amount of force to get into a property constitutes an attempt to "break in", we noticed that the staff team at large was split on the interpretation of the phrase. By crouch walking up to the front door of the property, then...

As practical enforcement goes, if you are growing somewhere sensible, I'd say yes. If you were found because you chose a shit spot, then no

I have changed this to use more common words. If you have any other questions, now is the best time to ask as we can change things that seem unclear.

To add to this, we had people sometimes park the firetruck at PD and nobody cared so it wasn't practically enforced. Imo as long as the firetruck fits in the parking bay without being in the way, it's probably fine

6 POINT REDUCTION IN READABILITY, ABORTED

Hello everyone, It has been almost a year since @Acerius and I undertook a comprehensive restructuring and rewriting of the rules, where there was a range of removals, merges, or shortenings of rule text. We managed to reduce the character count in that round by 35%, and take the number of...

Depends entirely on how they behave in doing so, but generally 9.3 or 7.5. For 9.3, all you need to do is make someone fear the offence of 9.1. The words "immediate" and "apprehend" are not used in 9.3, meaning no timeframe is specified and can be applied to fearing violence in the near future...

The violence in question needs to be likely to cause bodily harm, meaning the gun must be used in a way that can do that (actually firing). The violence also needs to be immediate.

This thread is so old I still get email notifications from it, fuck you rogue

Law 9.2 does not criminalise simply aiming or pointing a weapon. See 7.5/9.3 for more appropriate provisions for threatening behaviour or brandishing weapons. For the elements of 9.2 to be satisfied, immediate violence that is likely to cause great bodily harm must occur or be apprehended. Old...

Is this an ad

This happens when a Medic/Supervisor is still scanning the DNA when you respawn. If you've respawned by the time they press upload, it will still be added to your record.

FYI I am absolutely open to accepting this appeal, in fact I would prefer to given that you made up with the guy. But saying that you had nothing to do with it is just incorrect

You're the one who drove him there, you're also the one who told him to surrender and ask if anyone had zipties. When you realised you didn't, you repeatedly told your friend to kill him before you finally ran him over. I never told you this, I asked for information to ban Sonny but I never...

If anything, we want fewer shootouts, not more. We will probably never increase the number of raids per hour.

Max 3 people, yes. You can ziptie all of them to search them, but don't take anything from the guy with the worst stuff I guess.

We gotta link up with @ASRox on Truth sometime, I hear he posts there a lot... We've already spoken about this at length, most recently in October, but it still really sucks to see you go. It's been a pleasure having you around and I can't believe another one of my oldhead friends is leaving. I...

Yeah that sentence was iterated on like 100 times and lost all meaning, no idea wtf happened there...

I just noticed that I used an older draft of this thread, which did not include the most important rule change we made today: 3.11 Placing Drugs 3.11 Growing Drugs I acknowledge that this is a rather awkward place for rules of engagement to go, as 2.5 is generally more appropriate, but...

Because the first half of that sentence already says that players must not stand on player placed props

Hello everyone, As a result of an internal discussion, some minor rule changes have taken place to address some recently raised issues. Please take some time to familiarise yourselves with them here. We are also experimenting with changing the rules to use a dark theme instead. Please vote on...

Hi, As I am the one who issued the blacklist, I will not be dealing with this. I will, however, mention that I chose to issue longer blacklists in place of 'real' server punishments. I would be open to an apology if you choose to make one, or you could make a staff complaint on me instead. I...

I have unbanned your new account, but I am not able to process any transfers. I have added Fredy to the PM you sent me.

There is always room to enforce 3.15 on people who are driving unrealistically, though I am not comfortable with a blanket ban on this through the rules. We can, however, scrutinize situations wherein cars are wrecked due to wrong-way drivers more heavily and decide whether or not a...