Search results

Hi, can you please reupload the evidence as it has expired.

I will say this once and only once: Behave. It's obvious you two have some beef with one another, so this goes to both of you: Stop finding ways to antagonize one another. Action will not be taken as of today, but this is both your last and final warning to stop. If either of you submit a...

After a thorough review, we have reached the conclusion that you did, in fact, break 3.4 in this situation when you got out of the car and went to take cover. First, 3.4 guidelines (which you can find here) state the following: In this case, during most time you had to get to the back of the...

The player was given a chance to surrender, which they didn't do, hence it was okay to shoot them. It was by far not a silent raid either. The warning has been removed from your record. Reviewed with @HuskyD0G and @Matthew

Now do the limo

I know that's your opinion, but that's not our experience. More people pass their practicals than before. I believe before the stats were 1 in 3 pass, now it's 2 in 3. And even if they fail, they still get to keep their partial TFU status. So no, it's not gatekeeping. It's what @Megasaw said...

day

Sounds good. Prevents the whole bazaar parking from being set on fire

Enjoy :)

Hi, It appears the incident, which occured happened on 11th of January (or at least dating by when the evidence was posted). You appear to have followed an officer into the Office building, whilst there was an active shootout (shots were audible). If you wish to view the incident, it should...

No need to be shy about it. It's no secret anymore that we're porting over to FiveM any day now as Garry's Mod is obsolete...

Whilst a click may have been audible, that is not enough to determine where it came from as it could be in the upper or lower apartments. The rule states "known to be armed", therefore no visual information paired with the fact that it could've been anyone clicking their gun in the area (in...

Items to be refunded: - AK-47 + Mag + Stock - Rifle Compensator - Reflex Sight Weapon ID: 195687235

Rule 3.10:

Back in the day, for a reason, it was enforced as if non-government NPCs were somehow equal to that of a government employee's statement. That is no longer the case and not enforced that way for a while. Or at least it shouldn't be. Hell, for a while the Drug Dealer NPC was considered a reliable...

First and foremost, just because someone claims something in OOC doesn't mean the information is accurate. Use /help chat to get actual information. Secondly, you should know better. The main reason for your ban is not destroying the TV, but it's the fact that you went off duty, to perform an...

Hello, a report was opened with you on the server, where you were given your chance to give your side of the story, but instead left whilst it was open. In order to dispute this, you will need to provide evidence of this situation from your perspective. If you do not have a recording of your...

In the negatives you forgot to list: - We're already looking for money sinks for people to waste their money, not for them to get money back? The point of the properties being expensive would be completely ignored?

The downside is shops becoming less used as a result and people driving and visting different places enforces player interactions.

I do like the idea. A lot of people refuse to carry life alerts because the city is literally run by criminals. This would be nice.

You're lucky @Lhealey05 is even on, this early, in all fairness. More often that not there is not staff members available this early. I will reiterate my point again: Props can cause massive issues, so giving a player up to 115 props with little-to-no-staff on is not the brightest idea, even if...

You were given more than enough time to reply to this message. If you choose you wish to continue this dispute at a later date, add me on discord: tilin.si and I can assess your English knowledge at that time. From the "evidence" provided I have not seen enough to prove that you would be able...

You do a raid, your buddy gets downed, you escape. You see your buddy in a police car near PD. You decide to raid the PD, because you had every reason to. Your buddy chose to pick community service. You get punished for 3.4.

The issue isn't them. The issue is the people breaking them out. There is no way they could be aware of that.

By having a different perspective from both reports and watching people in noclip. The attention span of your average PERP player is a second or two when outside of a shootout (locked in during one though) And it's not only that it wouldn't work, it would cause issues with breaking people out...

To expand on this. Since this is set in policy, I don't really see a need for a timer. Anyone caught abusing it would simply receive a removal from the RTFO certification and a 1-month blacklist to reapply, as per the current standard of how we handle RTFO Infractions.

From a player's perspective, there is absolutely no negatives. But oh boy, for us to figure out who returned their props mid raid would not be a fun task. Or even prove, whether the player was aware there was a raid on their property and that the raiders are now fighting cops, would be...

Okay we're a bit overdramatizing why this isn't given to moderators. There's a few reasons why it likely hasn't been added already: - Yes, it literally gives the Senior Mod role a job to do apart from just it being a cool rank (there is other perks to it dw) - It limits as to who can extend...

Items to be refunded: - MP9 - MP9 mag - MP9 Stock - Reflex Sight - Rifle comp