Search results

light mode user IDIOT

It's not like reputable crafting orgs will just vanish, you'll just have to talk to a person instead of pressing a button on a website

@Dank is a demon in the Land Rover Defender and the Nissan Leaf. ÖfficeGang will not tolerate this slander

Just to spite you for the rating, no

It's fine, none of you can spell anyway

VaultCorp has already shut down most of the offending services, but principally yes.

Hello everyone, A few days ago, a rule change was applied that prevents any external website, app, or tool from replacing in-game mechanics or roleplay. This rule is targeted primarily at things that would allow players to do things off the server where a roleplay interaction would be more...

Hi, sorry for not reaching out, I didn't realise you were on the server. This was an old incident https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/lTpamf7zljZwYhS3X?invite=cr-MSxDbTcsMTk5MTg0NDcx&v=170

Perhaps you'd have been less confused and gotten a shorter ban if you hadn't disconnected from the server while Lewis was still talking to you. You've been punished 5 times in the last 10 days for breaking the rules, how often should we have let you get away with it before banning you for a...

Whereas we, as a Senior Management team, maintain that using any amount of force to get into a property constitutes an attempt to "break in", we noticed that the staff team at large was split on the interpretation of the phrase. By crouch walking up to the front door of the property, then...

As practical enforcement goes, if you are growing somewhere sensible, I'd say yes. If you were found because you chose a shit spot, then no

I have changed this to use more common words. If you have any other questions, now is the best time to ask as we can change things that seem unclear.

To add to this, we had people sometimes park the firetruck at PD and nobody cared so it wasn't practically enforced. Imo as long as the firetruck fits in the parking bay without being in the way, it's probably fine

Hello everyone, It has been almost a year since @Acerius and I undertook a comprehensive restructuring and rewriting of the rules, where there was a range of removals, merges, or shortenings of rule text. We managed to reduce the character count in that round by 35%, and take the number of...

yeah get to adding an Explorer and a Taurus, car bitch

Depends entirely on how they behave in doing so, but generally 9.3 or 7.5. For 9.3, all you need to do is make someone fear the offence of 9.1. The words "immediate" and "apprehend" are not used in 9.3, meaning no timeframe is specified and can be applied to fearing violence in the near future...

The violence in question needs to be likely to cause bodily harm, meaning the gun must be used in a way that can do that (actually firing). The violence also needs to be immediate.

This thread is so old I still get email notifications from it, fuck you rogue

Law 9.2 does not criminalise simply aiming or pointing a weapon. See 7.5/9.3 for more appropriate provisions for threatening behaviour or brandishing weapons. For the elements of 9.2 to be satisfied, immediate violence that is likely to cause great bodily harm must occur or be apprehended. Old...

Is this an ad

This happens when a Medic/Supervisor is still scanning the DNA when you respawn. If you've respawned by the time they press upload, it will still be added to your record.