Search results

therapy mate, always the best when you're struggling with something

Welcome back! :D

a hippopotamus is a hippo

I will accept this on the strict basis that if you break 3.4 within the next 3 months that your ban will be a minimum of 1 month with no chance of an accepted appeal.

:(

I accept your apology, however, I believe there is an evident recurring issue with your inability to follow simple rules, ensuring that you sit this out, with hopes that when you return, you will be able to do so without breaking the rules again.

o7 brother

VELO >

o7

I have spoken to the user in-game. They have received a warning for 2.5 and 3.4 as they have attempted to rob yourself whilst you have a visible firearm in your hand, and then killed you for no appropriate reasoning.

The user is currently in-game, I will attempt to contact them.

what a tune

o7

GG!

I dealt with this already, I have your 600k, just DM me on discord (@kerzify)

This will be discussed with members of the administrative team, an outcome will be posted when one is decided.

Create a ticket directed towards Patrol so it can get investigated.

Unfortunately after reviewing your ban dispute, we have came to a conclusion to deny it. After watching the evidence, it is clear to see that there were no direct threat towards your life, at any point. Therefore pulling your weapon out, and killing the user with the weapon on their back was...

happy birthday!

$28,700 to be refunded. No petrol money for you :), create an F6 when an Administrator+ is online. Scambans

Happy Birthday

Please stop asking for your previous ban apologies to be deleted, just so you can repost the same thing, Sza will get round to it when they do.

This was already dealt with. Please make a refund request for your tier cost for your Porsche, both weapons were returned.

why not just stop playing...

Ish After watching the evidence, I have came to the conclusion that rules were not violated by @Ethan Dunn, especially as when you reached the PD, they done a U-turn and left the area. However, I do believe that rules have been violated from the other party, who were driving the Tesla. They...

An outcome will be posted today.

After reviewing the evidence provided, we have deemed that you acted too fast. It would have been more appropriate to allow the other party more time to react to your commands. There were more than enough people that were involved in said raid to keep two members of the raiding party to gunpoint...