Search results

The user has not added my steam invite nor have they been on the server. The user will be issued with a 3 day ban for 3.4, 3.20 & 1.2 Reviewed with @Marcusy

As you stated yourself in this dispute; "This whole chase started because we had visible firearms on us". This is not a valid reason to flee as you have failed to investigate appropriately, meaning that you were unaware whether you were going to be ticketed for your violation of law 7.3 with a...

I don't really do perp montages, although I find Sony Vegas is definitely the easiest / best to use.

User added on steam, will await 24 hours for a response Reviewing with @Marcusy

Make a staff complaint on the staff member(s) who punished you.

Please clarify what exactly you are disputing so SMT have a clearer view. As it seems the only two things you have highlighted in this dispute is the 1.2 reasoning and the duration of the punishment?

Half of these, I think it was harder to crash...

@Medium response, which I can quite agree with somewhat, addresses mainly a pattern that roleplay servers eventually run into when mechanics encourage shootouts, unintentionally instead of roleplay. Hostage situations are supposed to create tension, character interaction and most importantly...

After reviewing footage and discussing this with other members of staff. We have deemed that 3.4 and 3.20 were in fact violated due to the facts of your apartment in Slums being raided, a user walking into the room and aiming a weapon at you, in which you decided to pull a weapon, resulting in...

Which part of the ban are you disputing? Only the 3.4 part?

To be refunded; $32,000

To be returned; 1x FN SCAR-L (198369508) 1x Rifle Compensator 1x Red Dot Sight 1x Stanag 30x Mag 5.56 Create an F6 when an Administrator+ is online

Ish @RespectMyVoid is willing to demonstrate leniency with your punishment. It will not be completely removed, although your current ban will be changed from 1 week to 2 days, meaning you will be unbanned on the 8th of March. The ban will stay in place to ensure that you spend time reading the...

I have spoken with the user in-game. They have been issued a warning for violating rule 3.21 and are aware of the rule moving forward

Are you apologising for your actions, disputing the fact that you didn't violate the rule 3.4 or disputing the length of the ban? You can find more information regarding this here; https://perpheads.com/threads/appealing-a-punishment-information.45091/

User added on steam, will await 24 hours for their response

To be refunded; 1x Brügger & Thomet MP9 (199052059) 1x 9x19mm Magazine x30 (MP9) 1x Brügger & Thomet MP9 Stock 1x Rifle Compensator Make an F6 when an Administrator+ is online

The user has not added me back on steam, and I haven't been able to contact them ingame. You can make a Refund Request for the following; 1x Brügger & Thomet MP9 1x 9x19mm Magazine x30 (MP9) 1x Brügger & Thomet MP9 Stock 1x Rifle Compensator 1x Reflex Sight The user will be issued a warning...

Ban expired

Definitely Barbados in November, I stayed in an unbelievable place

User added on steam, I will await 72 hours for a response.

I think my biggest loss on blackjack was around 1-2M, other than that, I've not had any insane winnings

No reply, nor have they been on the server. The user will be banned for 3 days for violating 3.20

User added on steam, I will allow them 24 hours to respond

https://bans.perpheads.com/warnings?warningId=49985

This sheet is factually wrong! I've had 10 disputes made on my bans, 3 of them being accepted and 7 of them being denied! (I feel I've also done more than 5 appeals...)

Thread locked.

The evidence displays that the player was not actively involved in the situation in a way that justified killing them, due to them being unarmed and killing them, is the reasoning of 2.5 being violated. Additionally, communication prior to this dispute including a DM from yourself, indicates...

After reviewing this dispute carefully alongside others, with the evidence provided and context in question, we have reached a decision regarding this dispute. The primary consideration in this dispute, is whether the officers choice of wording created the situation in which granted yourself...