-ish
The users will not be punished for 3.4 as their decision to comply with gunpoint would've resulted in certain death beyond any reasonable doubt on their part.
They will however both receive a warning for rule 2.1 - Play Realistically. The server as of right now does not offer a feature...
You could make players race against one another to complete these missions.
Like he only appears a few times per day, but gives a good payout to only 1 player.
Another good Crackhead Benji suggestion!
I think Benji's opinion points everything out. There's a reason we've got limited powers. There could always be more smods, but that comes with time and trust.
Suggestion Topic: Other
Suggestion Description: Raiding definition should receive a clearer definition on what is considered a raid in progress.
Current Definition:
Trespassing on an occupied property with the intention of stealing from it or its occupants or killing the players inside.
It...
Hi,
so the complaint is that a reprimand given by @Apo_llo was false. If that's the case head over to https://plpd.online/helpdesk/create and create a helpdesk ticket with the Office of Professional Standards (PSD). You will need to provide evidence of some sort (such as when the incident you...
Speaks for itself:
And please be honest the first time with us, not once you know there's no way out:
User will receive a 1 day ban for their actions - Rule 3.3 - Realistic Actions
Amended: Upon further review of the AR, it was found that the player did not violate any rules that would've resulted in the loss of your weapon(s).
Reviewed with @Collier and @Acerius.
As the player is currently banned and the weapon cannot be retrieved in the moment, create an F6 in-game to...
I'm no expert here, but I'm certain Church isn't below Regals.
@Mailman_allen Do you wish to correct your statement? Otherwise I'll confirm with the demo to see what exactly you were trying to achieve there.
As stated in: https://perpheads.com/threads/appealing-a-punishment-information.45091/:
- You cannot dispute a punishment because you feel the length was unjust, this must be done via a staff complaint instead.
Ignoring the fact that there's a rule preventing them from attempting another raid within 60 minutes of them dying, they were dead, no? Doubt a dead person can return.
Demo has been requested from @Smite99 and will be reviewed.
Meanwhile @Smite99 explain:
Why did you start shooting at them prior to them initiating a raid?
Why did you shoot out their tires afterwards?
As annoying this update may seem. There's currently no drawbacks to using an AS50 really... It fires relatively fast to the damage it delivers and if you have a crew big enough, it's almost certain you'll get it back for round 2, even if you die.
This will decrease the chances of it being using...
Due to this being your 3rd ban this month for the same reason and seeing that you got banned not even an hour ago, I don't see why this should get accepted.
@Lukas Simms will receive a 2 week blacklist for 3.4 and 4.2 from medic due to being punished for the same offense not too long ago.
It's obvious an attempt to stay away from the situation should've been made, not get directly engaged with it.
@Cold Ina will receive a warning for 3.4 as they shouldn't have approached the shootout, even if trying to counter the raid since officers were still on scene at the time.
Upon further review of the situation, @Cleetus Hawthorne had every right to assume the raid was over. He stored the gun prior to you starting the raid again.