Search results

-ish The only offense that really took place here is violating rule 5.4 - Organisation Relationships, where @Squizid assisted on a raid, whilst in a rivaled org. Due to @Squizid's extensive record, they will serve a short 1-day ban. The rest is personal issues and the only violation of 1.4...

I smack my keyboard, which makes things in order for other humans to smack their keyboard so it does other things. I also sit in meetings to learn absolutely nothing from them, except that the customer doesn't like that I smacked my keyboard exactly the way they described they wanted the...

Or alternatively make the board load up a website and we add an option to PLPD.online where supervisors can select the layout and draw on it in the browser, then this page displayed on the board updates whenever that's changed.

There is many possibilities as to how this happened, however it is very likely it came as a result of a RAT. Cheating software is notorious for having malware in it. So if you tried to cheat and are on the list of banned people, a fresh reinstall would do you good. Alternatively, but less...

It's disabled because ya'll keep downloading dodgy shit

I've done something along the lines of seeing average lengths of bans: https://perpheads.com/threads/ban-statistics.56082/ But at the end of the day. These statistics are rough overgeneralizations of the bans and are more for fun than to actually prove a point. Just like this post. To get an...

Because Fracket had to clean up all the data by hand due to the variations in the names written by players.

Noticed the poor data, couldn't bare it. New one with a lot more data will be posted soon.

Under review

Upon request as the player is already serving a 1 year ban.

They are restricted for 2 reasons: - Gameplay balance - But more importantly... So the sniper role isn't left without the L115A3 because some douche decided to rush in with the only weapon that there is a limited amount of. If we were to allow if for all sorts of combat, then chances are the...

@Megasaw

After reviewing the evidence, collected by the banning staff, it is evident that you had knowledge of the metagaming taking place, which you had failed to report. Reviewed with @Oddy

After reviewing the evidence collected by the banning staff, we have concluded that you partook in the reasoning provided in your ban reason. Reviewed with @Oddy

Please provide your own POV of the situation, not just a screenshot. You have 48 hours, otherwise this dispute will likely be denied.

You are already aware inside this dispute, why this is being denied it seems. You had plenty of time to react, but refused to do so. As you've said, the rule is black and white in this instance. An officer overstepping Use of Force should really be the part where you fear for your life. If...

Archive yes, but not remove iirc

They are unable to remove these remarks

What @exrobite posted. Because it spends needless amounts of taxpayer money over something that doesn't always benefit people.

This suggestion has to be satire, surely... WHAT DO YOU MEAN INCRIMINATE YOURSELF BY SAYING THE NAME OF A POLICY

You've violated both of the rules you were punished with, here's an explaination: 4.1 - You did not act according to laws 2.1 or 2.2 to justify you using lethal force against someone who was not a threat to you at the time. You did not once attempt to use a less-lethal option and the suspect...

It all depends what car you're used to... It caught me off guard as well. I am more annoyed by the fact that both me and the automatic turn off are in sync so the blinkers never go off now :| Thanks for reminding me to replace the sound with...

Maybe the default rug not being literally white would be great

I am so sad I had to go an not experience this

From the evidence provided with the warning (not your evidence), I see you're walking around the shootout before you actually get shot, whilst there's gunshots and armed people running around you and you're just staring through the window in the hallway.

Hi, can you please reupload the evidence as it has expired.

I will say this once and only once: Behave. It's obvious you two have some beef with one another, so this goes to both of you: Stop finding ways to antagonize one another. Action will not be taken as of today, but this is both your last and final warning to stop. If either of you submit a...

After a thorough review, we have reached the conclusion that you did, in fact, break 3.4 in this situation when you got out of the car and went to take cover. First, 3.4 guidelines (which you can find here) state the following: In this case, during most time you had to get to the back of the...

The player was given a chance to surrender, which they didn't do, hence it was okay to shoot them. It was by far not a silent raid either. The warning has been removed from your record. Reviewed with @HuskyD0G and @Matthew