Right, so really there have been a couple of rules broken from the officer's side which we will get into shortly, or really just now.
The rules which I believe the officer broke:
- 3.3 - I think this rule has been broken due to the fact that the officer didn't take in consideration that he was under gun point with about 2 - 3 people having their secondary weapons out pointed at him. He tried to walk to the side as if he wasn't getting shot at ( If anything the more realistic approach would be to either try to shoot them whilst getting under cover or by trying to run from the situation ) Something which he didn't do as he simply walked to the side and then died. After his death and come back, the first thing you see is the same officer holding out a gun as he's walking. Realistically unless there has been a called raid or there have been reports of gunshots in that area, officers are never supposed to have their guns out like that which indicates a breakage of 3.5 as the rule states "They must also forget/
may not act upon any and all details of their previous life" Something which he didn't do as he did act upon memories of his past life. Though I wont blabber on too much with this as two separate rules.
- 3.4 - The officer's life was put more under risk by trying to take his weapon out and eliminate the posed threats to his life. If he had cooperated with the people who started yelling at him commands, he would've lived. However he didn't which ultimately led to his death, also another scenario where the user is seen breaking the rule is by having his weapon out after coming back to the area after his death. This also ties in with 3.5 as the officer had kept memories of his previous life and for some reason shooting at the tyres of the people which had killed him which once again led to his death.
- 3.5 - This rule WAS broken as the officer had come back to the scene for some reason, his weapon out and ready to shoot. He came back to the same spot with his past memories as he was quick to respond to them reaching him and killing him. Whether his NLR was done or not, does not mean he had the right to come back to the area unless told to do so by the Lieutenant, Sergeant or any basically senior officer. So unless he can provide a demo where it justifies for him to come back, he will remain to be guilty for the breakage of this rule.
- 2.5 - If we clearly read the rule, "players are not allowed to excessively negatively affect the experiences of other players while playing on the server." If him coming back and destroying or rather shooting your tyres affected your roleplay in a negative manner then he has also broke this rule as really there was no reason for him to shoot at them.
- 3.6 - The officer had not done everything he possibly could to stay alive, this can be firstly seen when he's put under gun point where he takes out his gun. Then the second time the officer is seen breaking this rule is when he starts to move towards the barriers which stop cars from going inside the bazaar. His opportunity to survive would've been to run past them and round the corner to the other parking lot, where I assume his car was. Or if that was too far away then his second chance would be to hide behind one of the cars and tries to shoot the armed people from the cover. Then lastly is when he comes back and shoots the tyres for some reason. The reason I see this as him breaking the rules is because he comes back where he knows there are armed civilians and then breaks their car which leads to once again his death.
- 4.1 & 4.3 - These are together because well.. They tie in very nicely. As a officer he was expected to follow the law and perform his duties, I'm not saying he broke these in the first clip but the second clip when he comes back. The reason he broke these is because he is not performing his police duties and he has a firearm out in public for a not justifiable reason.
--
The rules which he broke are immense as it's basically just like reading a book. But regardless, I assume the staff member which is on duty to do ARs this week will deal with it as the other staff member from last week hasn't and this has been open for just over a week. So really I do hope this gets dealt with appropriately, though it does make me question what were the motives of the officer? I really have no idea, if you spent reading this post then have this
Have a nice day,
