Your Steam/In-game Name: Daragh // Jonathan Good
His/Her Steam/In-game Name: "Tyrone" // James Davis @James Davis
His/Her SteamID: STEAM_0:0:104867899
Why Should This Player Be Punished:
What he did:
I went from behind when he went in his shop and I gunpointed him, he turns around and whilst he was under gunpoint with a gun aimed straight to his head, he pulls his beretta out and due to me only having 9 bullets in he won, but if I'd of had 15 bullets I'd of killed him which means the rules he broke would of been even more severe.
Rules he broke:
How it is not justifiable:
The rules he broke can't be justified unless he has a VERY good explaination, meaning that he would of have to known how many bullets I had in my gun and my current health status, etc. He was gunpointed with a gun straight to his head and he pulled out a gun and started to gun me down, I did shoot at him and I believe I did it him a couple of times as he spilt blood, however due to me having a lack of bullets he had the upper-hand and shot me down. At not any point did I state how many bullets I had in my gun or my health status, anyway it doesn't matter if he knew because I had around 10 bullets which is enough to kill him and my health was perfectly healthy, so in my eyes his actions are not justifiable. If I'd of had the full 15 bullets he would of been dead and him breaking the rules would of lead to his death but I only had 9 or 10 so he is lucky in that case, but it is still 3.4 either way, whether he killed me or not. Also, if I'd of had a good shot he would of been dead also, but just because I don't have a good shot doesn't mean he can pull a gun out under gunpoint nor does he know that anyway as I've never been in a gun fight with him, even if I ever was then he'd be breaking the new life rule.
Evidence (Demo Required):
Tick: 1:48
His/Her Steam/In-game Name: "Tyrone" // James Davis @James Davis
His/Her SteamID: STEAM_0:0:104867899
Why Should This Player Be Punished:
What he did:
I went from behind when he went in his shop and I gunpointed him, he turns around and whilst he was under gunpoint with a gun aimed straight to his head, he pulls his beretta out and due to me only having 9 bullets in he won, but if I'd of had 15 bullets I'd of killed him which means the rules he broke would of been even more severe.
Rules he broke:
Players must at all times act realistically, meaning that any actions taken that may put a player’s In-Character life, freedom from imprisonment and/or general wellbeing at risk must be done so in a realistic fashion, for realistically good/beneficial reasons and in such a way that can be justified as reasonable.
How it is not justifiable:
The rules he broke can't be justified unless he has a VERY good explaination, meaning that he would of have to known how many bullets I had in my gun and my current health status, etc. He was gunpointed with a gun straight to his head and he pulled out a gun and started to gun me down, I did shoot at him and I believe I did it him a couple of times as he spilt blood, however due to me having a lack of bullets he had the upper-hand and shot me down. At not any point did I state how many bullets I had in my gun or my health status, anyway it doesn't matter if he knew because I had around 10 bullets which is enough to kill him and my health was perfectly healthy, so in my eyes his actions are not justifiable. If I'd of had the full 15 bullets he would of been dead and him breaking the rules would of lead to his death but I only had 9 or 10 so he is lucky in that case, but it is still 3.4 either way, whether he killed me or not. Also, if I'd of had a good shot he would of been dead also, but just because I don't have a good shot doesn't mean he can pull a gun out under gunpoint nor does he know that anyway as I've never been in a gun fight with him, even if I ever was then he'd be breaking the new life rule.
Evidence (Demo Required):
Tick: 1:48
