Ban Dispute (Vollgas)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Points
10
Punishment Type: Ban
Punishment Subtype: Server Ban
Appeal Type: Dispute[Evidence]
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @Vollgas
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 3 Months

Your Steam Name: Olliew05
Your Roleplay Name: Johnny Henderson
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:36442727

Why were you punished?: My ban was originally 3 months and am here to apologise about that and see if i can have my ban reduced but feel like the 3 months was very excessive as it was taken completely out of context and was not saying those comments directly to anyone. I apologise as what I said was entirely inappropriate to be using in game chat at all despite it not not being targeted to anyone. However i just checked my ban duration and says it has been extended to 4 months. I spoke to some of my org members that were involved and they said everyone was issued a warning so unsure why it has been extended for an entire month.

Why should this appeal be considered?: I think my ban reduction should be considered as an entire month added to my ban is very excessive as everyone involved in this incident was supposed to receive a warning and came out of the blue as i was already banned for weeks prior to receiving it. And in terms of my original ban for 3 months I am very sorry as my comments may have been deemed offensive but i was simply talking to my friends in the org and the clip was taken by someone walking by and the entire conversation was not recorded. I can understand why i have been banned but as i said there was no one in particular i was speaking about / to and seems liek the guy who recorded it just wanted to see me get banned for no reason. As I said this is simply a dispute and can handle my ban but just want to maybe see it get reduced. Thank you for reading.
 
If you have a problem with the extension, make a staff complaint for your other punishments you were given, please read the ban reason.

2.6, 3.4 - User failed to follow orders while under gun-point because he thought the other user was breaking the rules. AR: https://perpheads.com/threads/action-request-warwick.70444/ // Extended by Tilin for 1.2 - Islamophobic comments // Extended again by Wescott - 3.4 - Users put their lives and freedom at unnecessary risk by raiding Regals with a bank robbery next door, and while someone was yelling, there was a hostage in the defender's apartment with police in earshot. A sufficient investigation given the risks would have shown police outside Regals. // Accepted AR
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top