Explain this ban pls

[John Daymon]

I'm very confused, to me it sounds like the user was violating 3.4 by running away from a gunpoint which makes it totally acceptable for the man who got banned to run him over???

if its not the case write a reason that we all understand plsssssssssssss

 

[CodezBlack]

You need more context to this before you want to question it. The officer could have run around the corner or had evidence and/or justifiable suspicion that the person gun pointing him was going to kill him which gives him the right to run away from gunpoint. If it was proven that the officer did break 3.4 and the one who ran him over was involved (As in the actual gun pointing itself not just in the area) then I personally find the ban invalid otherwise it's valid.

 

[Collier]

Not quite sure why you've involved yourself in this, but there is probably a good reason for the ban and you're jumping to conclusions you really can't prove. You're not entitled to an explanation for someone else's ban. If Danny thinks it's invalid, he should dispute it, if another staff member needs to know for a sit they might have with Danny should he break 3.4 again, they can ask Draxen personally or leave a comment or whatever.

I will now close this thread.