Community Suggestion Make Moderators be able to accept pictures

[chopperr]

Suggestion Title: Make Moderators be able to accept pictures
Suggestion Description: Would make my life and others easier when there's no senior mod+ on or devs are afk. I think moderators should be able to review pictures because if they have the privilege and enough trust in them to ban and much more I think they should be able to review pictures.

Why should this be added?:
- More pictures reviewed

What negatives could this have?:
- Can't think of any.

What problem would this suggestion solve?: Waiting hours for pic to be reviewed

 

[HuskyD0G]

Not a good idea, especially with the bad apples these past months

 

[Bnjemann]

We already ended up with some really stupid signs slipping thru the filters over the time this feature existed. Moderators get less perms than Smod+ because over the years certain permissions were abused (license plate, fix car, etc.)

I am certain there are moderators who can be entrusted with permissions to do so but as @HuskyD0G said above, there’s been and likely will continue to be moderators out there who don’t consider risk of demotion as a viable deterrent for abuse of powers, entrusting them with a permission seen as so nonchalant to misuse isn’t going to do us any good in terms of that.

Part of the point of this is it’s just easier to have less reasons to demote the most common staff rank on the server.

A viable alternative could be just promoting more Smods, creating an external system we can approve or reject them without being on the server, or giving it to senior helpers too would be viable as senior helper is an immensely challenging rank to achieve and all senior helpers are trustworthy with this privilege in my opinion.

 

[Chris Flynn]

We already ended up with some really stupid signs slipping thru the filters over the time this feature existed. Moderators get less perms than Smod+ because over the years certain permissions were abused (license plate, fix car, etc.)

I am certain there are moderators who can be entrusted with permissions to do so but as @HuskyD0G said above, there’s been and likely will continue to be moderators out there who don’t consider risk of demotion as a viable deterrent for abuse of powers, entrusting them with a permission seen as so nonchalant to misuse isn’t going to do us any good in terms of that.

Part of the point of this is it’s just easier to have less reasons to demote the most common staff rank on the server.

A viable alternative could be just promoting more Smods, creating an external system we can approve or reject them without being on the server, or giving it to senior helpers too would be viable as senior helper is an immensely challenging rank to achieve and all senior helpers are trustworthy with this privilege in my opinion.

Yes, i agree on Senior Helper idea yes

 

[Tilin]

We already ended up with some really stupid signs slipping thru the filters over the time this feature existed. Moderators get less perms than Smod+ because over the years certain permissions were abused (license plate, fix car, etc.)

I am certain there are moderators who can be entrusted with permissions to do so but as @HuskyD0G said above, there’s been and likely will continue to be moderators out there who don’t consider risk of demotion as a viable deterrent for abuse of powers, entrusting them with a permission seen as so nonchalant to misuse isn’t going to do us any good in terms of that.

Part of the point of this is it’s just easier to have less reasons to demote the most common staff rank on the server.

A viable alternative could be just promoting more Smods, creating an external system we can approve or reject them without being on the server, or giving it to senior helpers too would be viable as senior helper is an immensely challenging rank to achieve and all senior helpers are trustworthy with this privilege in my opinion.

I think Benji's opinion points everything out. There's a reason we've got limited powers. There could always be more smods, but that comes with time and trust.

 

[rogue]