Rule Suggestion (3.4 Putting your Life at Risk)

[Benpob]

Suggestion Topic: 3.4 Putting your Life at Risk
Suggestion Description: To not comply with reasonable orders given under the direct threat of a lethal weapon pointed at you, such as a mugging, Unless you have the ability to try to defend yourself.  At the moment the system is all in favour for the mugger, the other player is not given a chance to defend him or her self and take the risk of fighting to survive and protect ones property or dying. this would also, in my opinion make it more risky for the mugger instead of him/her mugging whoever he chooses with barely any consequences as it is now.

Why should this be added?:
-you have a chance to defend your self and your property
-Muggers don't have free reign as they do now
-Adds to a more realistic role play scenario
-muggers would have to weigh up the pros and cons of committing the crime

What negatives could this have?:
- There is a very high chance the defender will die
- I Personally cant think of anymore but would love to hear others thoughts

 

[Jenga]

take another detroit urban survival class and you might get it down, too slow on the draw

 

[Allen Kennedy]

People are already very loose and fast with their life when they shouldn't be, I can't imagine this is a step towards addressing that.

 

[Dank]

As Jenga shows rule 3.4 means you don't bring your life in danger like you did there. Changing the rules because you do not want to get mugged is not the way to go