Rule Suggestion (3.7 Properties)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
68
Reaction score
35
Points
275
Location
Parts Unknown
Suggestion Topic: 3.7 Properties
Suggestion Description: I think this rule needs revisions specifically for building in the pathway of baz and surrounding of baz . If the entire baz is full and someone wants to put a table down and run a casino I feel they should be able to.

Why should this be added?:
1. It doesnt negatively affect anyone[except admins who dont run shops...] in baz as they leave enough room for people to pass.
2. They dont take over an ENTIRE shop for a simple casino which promotes people to actually run shops
3. Some people are allowed to do it and other people arent so why not let everyone :D

What negatives could this have?:
-It can look tacky I guess. That can be mitigated with clear expression that If It doesnt look presentable then it cant stay.

if you have something id be EVER so HAPPY to DISCUSS...
 
Messages
748
Reaction score
639
Points
670
Location
Parts Unknown
This is exactly what you SHOULDN’T do if you’re trying to propose rule changes to the staff team, there are staff members who do run shops however this literally holds no relevance and you come across as hostile or I’m getting some babyrage impression based on a previous situation here? Everything else mentioned especially to do with FPS are points I’m also in agreement with.
Bros never met @Super_
 
Messages
2,428
Reaction score
4,522
Points
1,205


For reasons discussed in thread. V6 will attempt to address these issues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top