- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 10
Punishment Type: Warning
Appeal Type: Apology
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @Ezza
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: Not Applicable
Your Steam Name: Balcony Enjoyer
Your Roleplay Name: Jamal Stone
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:501758558
Why were you punished?: Excessive Negativity
Why should this appeal be considered?: I was warned for shooting someone outside his property (he had already left his property) that didn't have a weapon out even though I was raiding his property. I just don't see how it's excessive negativity, the rules don't even say that I am to deem an unarmed player any less of a threat than an armed player, all it states is that a player who is visible armed is a significant enough threat. I would argue that all the defenders in a base are significant enough threats to me as the raider and therefore I should be able to just shoot and kill all defenders. Just like how anyone who comes into my property as a raider even if they don't have their hands up I should be able to shoot, otherwise what's to stop 15 people from running into my house during a raid. Also I just want to add that the defender wasn't exiting his property, he wasn't entering his property and he wasn't inside his property, he was outside of his property after ALREADY exiting his property meaning that none of the last snippet in rule 2.5 would apply to this scenario.
Additional Information: As a new player I don't believe I should have been warned for something that isn't clearly laid out in the rules, it doesn't specify anything when it comes to unarmed players.
Appeal Type: Apology
Which staff member issued the punishment?: @Ezza
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: Not Applicable
Your Steam Name: Balcony Enjoyer
Your Roleplay Name: Jamal Stone
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:501758558
Why were you punished?: Excessive Negativity
Why should this appeal be considered?: I was warned for shooting someone outside his property (he had already left his property) that didn't have a weapon out even though I was raiding his property. I just don't see how it's excessive negativity, the rules don't even say that I am to deem an unarmed player any less of a threat than an armed player, all it states is that a player who is visible armed is a significant enough threat. I would argue that all the defenders in a base are significant enough threats to me as the raider and therefore I should be able to just shoot and kill all defenders. Just like how anyone who comes into my property as a raider even if they don't have their hands up I should be able to shoot, otherwise what's to stop 15 people from running into my house during a raid. Also I just want to add that the defender wasn't exiting his property, he wasn't entering his property and he wasn't inside his property, he was outside of his property after ALREADY exiting his property meaning that none of the last snippet in rule 2.5 would apply to this scenario.
Additional Information: As a new player I don't believe I should have been warned for something that isn't clearly laid out in the rules, it doesn't specify anything when it comes to unarmed players.
![✪[Sky]-Nooni](/data/avatars/s/6/6738.jpg?1533861151){kind=avatar}
