Warning Dispute (3izu)

[Treehouse]

Punishment Type: Warning
Appeal Type: Dispute[Evidence]
Which staff member issued the punishment?: 3izu
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: Not Applicable

Your Steam Name: whatsdis
Your Roleplay Name: Derrick Holmes
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:721171127

Why were you banned/blacklisted?: No

Why should this appeal be considered?: I believe I should be un-warned because it seems that the admin who issued the warning relied on false information. The admin claimed to have witnessed me breaking the new life rule multiple times, but strangely, this was never brought up until the time I actually did it. It's crucial that we maintain honesty and transparency in our moderation process. Penalizing me for something that was allegedly happening multiple times, without prior warnings or discussions, doesn't seem fair or consistent. I believe in a fair and just community where punitive actions are taken only after due process and a genuine understanding of the situation. By being un-warned, I willcontinue to engage with the community with a clean slate and make sure not to break the rule again

Additional Information: it only happened once and won't happen again i have learned my lesson

 

[A1L]

You were warned, you still broke NLR, I literally saw multiple notifications in chat and notified you loads of times too

 

[Treehouse]

You were warned, you still broke NLR, I literally saw multiple notifications in chat and notified you loads of times too

yeah i sawn the notifications popping up, while i was responding to his ticket he opened for me talking to me

 

[A1L]

yeah i sawn the notifications popping up, while i was responding to his ticket he opened for me talking to me

Right, but you still broke the rule, right? It says in the appeals information - You should only make a dispute if you feel the punishment was invalid. But as far as I can see, this is clearly valid. No?

 

[Treehouse]

Right, but you still broke the rule, right? It says in the appeals information - You should only make a dispute if you feel the punishment was invalid. But as far as I can see, this is clearly valid. No?

definitely feel like a verbal discussion could have been had instead of lying to make it seem like something deeper :shrug:

 

[Treehouse]

Right, but you still broke the rule, right? It says in the appeals information - You should only make a dispute if you feel the punishment was invalid. But as far as I can see, this is clearly valid. No?

delete the post if its invalid then

 

[Treehouse]

Right, but you still broke the rule, right? It says in the appeals information - You should only make a dispute if you feel the punishment was invalid. But as far as I can see, this is clearly valid. No?

"You should only make a dispute if you feel the punishment was invalid" Clearly i do feel as if the punishment is invalid and believe i could have gotten a verbal warning and that's why the post was made? and isn't that where you are supposed to say if its accepted or denied? (spoiler its denied cause the staff is corrupt), not don't make a post cause its not valid?

 

[A1L]

"You should only make a dispute if you feel the punishment was invalid" Clearly i do feel as if the punishment is invalid and believe i could have gotten a verbal warning and that's why the post was made? and isn't that where you are supposed to say if its accepted or denied? (spoiler its denied cause the staff is corrupt), not don't make a post cause its not valid?

You can not dispute the punishment, you must make a staff complaint if you think the punishment is excessive, which it is not, you did break NLR though so there is no dispute of that and what are you even talking about the staff is corrupt? lmfao

 

[Treehouse]

You can not dispute the punishment, you must make a staff complaint if you think the punishment is excessive, which it is not, you did break NLR though so there is no dispute of that and what are you even talking about the staff is corrupt? lmfao

don't bait me into you banning me by saying more. put it into denied then progeria project

 

[A1L]

don't bait me into you banning me by saying more. put it into denied then progeria project

You're just saying stupid stuff at this point, go make a staff complaint if you think someone is corrupt, don't blatantly slander staff in a post when you're clearly in the wrong