Battlefield V
- Thread starter McYeke
- Start date
However they weren't active in the battlefront with weapons actively shooting their opponents to my knowledge
Who cares if there's women fighting or one has a prosthetic arm, it shouldn't really matter if the game is actually good.
Wait for reviews/actual gameplay before deciding you won't ever play it just because you don't even know how to interact with imaginary women in video games. It's not like there weren't any female combatants in WW2.
Violet Evergarden 2.0 btw
Wait for reviews/actual gameplay before deciding you won't ever play it just because you don't even know how to interact with imaginary women in video games. It's not like there weren't any female combatants in WW2.
Violet Evergarden 2.0 btw
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wanda_Gertz
http://thefemalesoldier.com/blog/klavdiya-kalugina
Some women did fight in the war, although not many. I'd bet theres a lot more we probably don't know about. But I really don't see why people are making this a big issue since Battlefield isn't a super realistic game like Squad or Arma.
It doesn't look too bad tbh
Although the vibrant, nearly eye-searing color scheme, which belongs more in a CoD game than the usual Battlefield game, does throw me off a little bit, there is too much emphasis, from what I've read on several places, on the fact that there is a woman fighting with a prosthetic arm (basically just hook lmao) and people are crying wolf at the top of their lungs that it's gonna be some weird steampunk shit.
They did also say they are getting rid of those stupid paywalls too like premium passes and DLC's, but this is EA so i'll have to see it to believe it.
Although the vibrant, nearly eye-searing color scheme, which belongs more in a CoD game than the usual Battlefield game, does throw me off a little bit, there is too much emphasis, from what I've read on several places, on the fact that there is a woman fighting with a prosthetic arm (basically just hook lmao) and people are crying wolf at the top of their lungs that it's gonna be some weird steampunk shit.
They did also say they are getting rid of those stupid paywalls too like premium passes and DLC's, but this is EA so i'll have to see it to believe it.
the issue i have with it is that its super important for them to force out a girl as the hero in the trailer lol
dunno they will probably have attachments on the guns again which i hate cus red dot sights are shit are not realistic.
dunno they will probably have attachments on the guns again which i hate cus red dot sights are shit are not realistic.
transparent plastic foil and a red dot pasted on it and there you go
Real men played 1942
As for the trailer, I don't care so much about the girl although it's clear they are whipping around their politically correct dicks. My issue is, why the fuck are they wearing dumb hipster clothing with facepaint, miss me with that gay shit.
Last edited:
Fucknig Feminist , ban plz
- Thread starter
- #35
I didn't quite understand that either, looked more like a blackops mess than a Battlefield game, and the game looks really fucking bright too from this trailer that claims is "gameplay"
- Messages
- 2,615
- Reaction score
- 4,231
- Points
- 845
I'd much rather have paid DLC's than the cancer called microtransactions. remember the times you paid 10$ for an extension pack as big as the game itself?
From what I now gather it's a multiplayer trailer, and you can create your own soldier which makes a little more sense, I still don't like the idea of giving everyone the choice of running around as amputee lesbians in a WW2 setting however.
