Dumbest Failed Robbery Attempt

Status
Not open for further replies.
bro missed a stationary targetlike 4 times. also you killed them js for saying can you put your hands up which i dont think is allowed
 
you're allowed to kill armed robbers, it's even legal. (up to the part where I took the gun and ran away, but while illegal IC, it doesn't break any OOC rules)
Alr ill also rdm people which have a gun who are saying hands up as a joke
 
(you shot a random guy who wasnt even asking u to put ur hands up and his gun was on his back(top 3 rdms ever))
Read the description for context.

I was merely passing through the area, when two people, dressed exactly the same down to the shoes, followed me, together.

They continued doing so, even after I brandished a gun. One of them tells me to “put my hands up, or we will shoot you.”

After I shot the armed one, the one that initiated the robbery admits that it was a robbery, but lies and claims the other person allegedly “wasn’t involved,” despite them together following me earlier and being the only one from their side to bring a gun.

Once they declare their intent of Robbery, it is not “Random Death Match” to kill them if they’re armed, it’s “justified homicide.”
 
Alr ill also rdm people which have a gun who are saying hands up as a joke
If a cop sees you walk up to a stranger with a gun and say “hands up” as a ‘joke,’ don’t be surprised when you get very real charges of Armed Robbery… if you survive being apprehended.
 
Read the description for context.

I was merely passing through the area, when two people, dressed exactly the same down to the shoes, followed me, together.

They continued doing so, even after I brandished a gun. One of them tells me to “put my hands up, or we will shoot you.”

After I shot the armed one, the one that initiated the robbery admits that it was a robbery, but lies and claims the other person allegedly “wasn’t involved,” despite them together following me earlier and being the only one from their side to bring a gun.

Once they declare their intent of Robbery, it is not “Random Death Match” to kill them if they’re armed, it’s “justified homicide.”
Holy mental gymnastics
 
Read the description for context.

I was merely passing through the area, when two people, dressed exactly the same down to the shoes, followed me, together.

They continued doing so, even after I brandished a gun. One of them tells me to “put my hands up, or we will shoot you.”

After I shot the armed one, the one that initiated the robbery admits that it was a robbery, but lies and claims the other person allegedly “wasn’t involved,” despite them together following me earlier and being the only one from their side to bring a gun.

Once they declare their intent of Robbery, it is not “Random Death Match” to kill them if they’re armed, it’s “justified homicide.”
dressed the same (default new player outfit)
following you (not illegal)
Shot the armed one (gun was on his back he didnt say anything and he was like 10 feet away)
lies and claims the other person not being involved (he literally did nothing LOL)
 
dressed the same (default new player outfit)
Fair, I’ll concede this point.
following you (not illegal)
Following someone with a gun on your back and with intent to rob them is.
Shot the armed one (gun was on his back he didnt say anything and he was like 10 feet away)
lies and claims the other person not being involved (he literally did nothing LOL)
You can literally see him follow along with their partner in the video I posted. So what if he was following at a distance of 10 feet, when his rifle’s effective range is over 500 feet?

He was still a real imminent threat, by deciding to be an armed robber and target someone defensively brandishing a gun.
 
This discussion has clearly developed beyond the original scope of the original post's intent. This will be locked.
Do not take this as an invitation to discuss it further in the shoutbox, your messages will be deleted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top