- Messages
- 1,194
- Reaction score
- 3,804
- Points
- 620
So like many of you lovely members out there know already, Luke was un-banned from the server a few days ago. His ban was NOT removed, but lowered to 3 months, with the reason gone.
Before this was edited, the ban was as so...
As we all know, he didn't make a public appeal like every other member is forced to do, meaning members were unable to give their opinion, which seems to me very unfair. Firstly, if a private appeal WAS made, are other members given the option to do this? If not, why not? Secondly, if no appeal was made, then why on earth was his ban lowered to 3 months, and the reason removed? I would like to think there is a good reason for this, however if not and it was a case of certain staff being biased, then it is extremely unfair to the whole community.
I am not calling out the staff team, saying they are being biased etc., I am simply making this thread to get other people's opinions on this (depending on why he was un-banned), and possibly some clarification as to why he was un-banned.
Thanks.
Before this was edited, the ban was as so...
As we all know, he didn't make a public appeal like every other member is forced to do, meaning members were unable to give their opinion, which seems to me very unfair. Firstly, if a private appeal WAS made, are other members given the option to do this? If not, why not? Secondly, if no appeal was made, then why on earth was his ban lowered to 3 months, and the reason removed? I would like to think there is a good reason for this, however if not and it was a case of certain staff being biased, then it is extremely unfair to the whole community.
I am not calling out the staff team, saying they are being biased etc., I am simply making this thread to get other people's opinions on this (depending on why he was un-banned), and possibly some clarification as to why he was un-banned.
Thanks.