6v admin abuse stop

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
16
Reaction score
3
Points
165
Location
Alberta, Canada
so your been around since 2013 why / whats stopping you from implementing rules in regards to your book of rules if there serious to you why haven't you implement scripts to deal with this ex Mollie if this is not a raid tool why is it not a script to resolve abuse why haven't you used your developers to fix your f6 problems why are u still operating in a sense of v6 that is just a map fix ur admin problems basically u allow staff to decider rule on the own instead of hard line the rules why are rules so wide it can be loop holed but when loop hold u pzazz how is one to under stand with a 0 iq u allow abuse of rule but let your friends to loop whole rules. this shit is insane. one person can presswadee the rules an get away with shit who is stopping u from making dishions basced one faveritizem the staff direction its fucked if u rule brake rules peroid why dose other get proitory over other this is un fair to others why is it that a rule is not a rule peroid why are u letting your staff abuse ?
 
I don’t understand but I disagree


But seriously, make staff complaints if you think any member of staff is acting with bias or abusing their powers. Complaints are taken seriously, regardless of who it’s on.
This isn’t helping in any way.
 
not no dissing v6 im only making a point if this is need, script are needed to stop abuse why need staff if u can stop it via script.
 
How is a script going to detect whether use of a Molotov is within the confines of the rules or not? Every situation has so many different parameters to consider, a simple script would never be able to take all those things into consideration.
 
I do not agree, because a script is not an AI. If you gave an AI all information regarding the rules, laws, and circumstances of a situation, it’ll probably be able to come to a conclusion whether something is allowed within the rules - but even so, it is still an AI and therefore not 100% guaranteed to be right.
Who’s going to code this AI to deal with each situation that occurs in every single instant, and who’s going to provide the infrastructure to support it? No one.
 
its not about ai its about the vague rules period how is one to under stand if im stupid so many thing can be different as u say why haven't it been re worded to exempt this
 
so if reading of a book its ok why not have it so. i as a new player need to read a book of rules to plat why not make it understandable PEROID. we at the point of no return an punish for it why not expand it so a person with 0 iq nca make snece of it.
 
ex Mollie if this is not a raid tool why is it not a script to resolve abuse
There is simply no way to code a system that knows when a molotov is being used appropriately, that is completely impossible.

Ban and warning reasons are public, and we have a lot of staff members who routinely click through recent punishments just to read them. If a punishment reason looks dodgy, one of us will likely flag it and contact the staff member who issued it. Beyond that, any player could dispute a punishment they have received for it to be reviewed by different staff members.

The point I am trying to make is that there are several checks to make sure that, in general, punishments are fairly consistent and enforcement of certain rules and situations remains the same. Us actually needing to intervene is quite rare, meaning that on average, most punishments are fine.

In your case, specifically, you died in a Hungriges Schwein situation, respawned, and tried to torch the whole place a few minutes later. There is not a single staff member on the team who would allow anyone to do something like that.

If you believe your punishment is invalid, please create a dispute. If you have a grievance about how a staff member has dealt with you, please make a staff complaint. If you believe a specific rule needs changing, please make a rule suggestion.
 
if we at the point that we need a book to understand why not make it understandable i would rather read 100 pages to be sure than not why not be clear than vage.
 
not on about my mollie im on about the rule being to vage to be beable to loop hole them in general if they are needed to be rewored as such then why not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top