- Messages
- 50
- Reaction score
- 34
- Points
- 250
Your Steam Name: Betty drizzle
Your Roleplay Name: Betty Drizzle
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:768440165
Player's Steam Name: Code monkey
Player's Roleplay Name: Brandy Martello
Player's SteamID: STEAM_0:0:183447894
Why should this player be punished?: the situation started with a shootout caused by a misunderstanding between 2 orgs, no crowbaring to the base was attempted, no gunpointing happened and no trespassing onto the property occured therefore it was not a raid, this means that the user code monkey had broken 3.4 as shown in the rules "Remaining near shootouts while unarmed/uninvolved, or with the intention of looting weapons." the user also said he countered the raid, it was never a raid to be "countered" so i dont know how thats possible, the users demo has to be requested for this to be investigated, i have already asked Efan if i needed evidence for this to be investigated and he said that its up to the investigating staff member to get the demo
Evidence Link: https://their.demo.is.evidence
Your Roleplay Name: Betty Drizzle
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:768440165
Player's Steam Name: Code monkey
Player's Roleplay Name: Brandy Martello
Player's SteamID: STEAM_0:0:183447894
Why should this player be punished?: the situation started with a shootout caused by a misunderstanding between 2 orgs, no crowbaring to the base was attempted, no gunpointing happened and no trespassing onto the property occured therefore it was not a raid, this means that the user code monkey had broken 3.4 as shown in the rules "Remaining near shootouts while unarmed/uninvolved, or with the intention of looting weapons." the user also said he countered the raid, it was never a raid to be "countered" so i dont know how thats possible, the users demo has to be requested for this to be investigated, i have already asked Efan if i needed evidence for this to be investigated and he said that its up to the investigating staff member to get the demo
Evidence Link: https://their.demo.is.evidence