Action Request (Valurim)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
45
Reaction score
5
Points
90
Your Steam Name: 12369c8cv1p72e7[1c2c8b151gsad
Your Roleplay Name: Yang Lou
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:225232531

Player's Steam Name: Valurim
Player's Roleplay Name: Valurim
Player's SteamID: STEAM_0:1:154568770

Why should this player be punished?: Valurim said theres a hostage in regals four (where i was, info on hostage is incorrect) in local chat, five people that were about to raid me heard/saw it as well as the two officers outside dealing with the bank raid at the time. He said this whilst he was in regals one whilst there was zero hostage situation, risking his life and my life for zero reason.

Evidence Link: https://streamable.com/iay5rr
 



@Valurim, please explain why you said there was a hostage for no reason in an attempt to get them raided by police.

You have 72 hours to respond before I make my decision.
 




Verdict
@Valurim made a statement in text chat that an apartment had a hostage in an attempt to get them raided when they did not have one. While this statement could fall under 2.5, it doesn't meet the criteria as no adverse events occurred as a result. However, due to officers being within earshot of this statement being made during a bank raid, @Valurim put his freedom at risk by attempting to incite a police raid on someone else based on false information. Furthermore, I have no doubt that he was aware of the officers nearby and that his actions were intentional.

Rules Broken
3.4 - User put his freedom at risk by making false hostage claims against another apartment in an attempt to get them raided while there were officers in the vicinity.

Punishment
Due to a ban earlier this month for 3.4, a FIVE-DAY ban will be issued in line with his previous.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top