- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 17
- Points
- 40
Punishment Type: Ban
Appeal Type: Dispute
Which staff member issued the punishment?: Dank
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 1 Month
Your Steam Name: any name you wish
Your Roleplay Name: Ted Hastings
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:61037935
Why were you banned/blacklisted?: 1.4, 2.5, 2.6, 3.4 - User planned blowing up his own appartment with another user in totally excessive way and then let said user do the crime so he would not get banned knowing the crime to be excessive
Why should this appeal be considered?: Firstly 1.4, I'm not sure how this could possibly apply here as I simply did not cause any problems at all.
As for 2.5, you said that this action was excessive and not justifiable given the crime, however, Murtsley had just murdered someone in the eyes of the law and would've been imprisoned for 10 years and given a £10,000 fine due to the presence of a medic who would've uploaded DNA of the body and a warrant would likely have been set. If we had instead dragged the body out into the forest we would've undoubtedly been seen by the medic or potentially a police officer speeding up his arrest and not allowing us to escape at all.
As for 3.4, I have no idea how I risked my life here given I was standing on the bridge and the only reason I died was because @Dank abused his permissions and spawned in an AS50 to shoot me point blank (despite missing twice)
I did not think that this action was excessive whatsoever so felt no need to report @Murtsley to staff as you said I should've and because you banned me for 2.6. Murtsleys action was entirely justifiable given his previous crime and the fact no one else was in the apartment complex at the time. He even asked @Ellie how to start the fire and she teleported to him and still told him how to do it.
You can also see in the demo that the fire started was relatively small and achieved the desired effect by causing the body to burn, I'm unaware as to what happened after this but this could've easily been dealt with by the PLPD using fire extinguishers and caused no real problems for anyone. The only person who broke 3.4 here was Dank for AS50ing me for no reason and getting himself a warrant for 9.5.
Edit:
I just found out a police officer had managed to extinguish it using a fire extinguisher that they had already used on another fire and still had plenty left so clearly the fire wasn't that big and only achieved it's desired effect of removing DNA from the body. (@nutrient10)
Additional Information: https://mega.nz/file/tp0TUTIC#YDm56vd5zYLFwtcSMBiHalUTSfO3KmguMcw5WqxyHBI
Appeal Type: Dispute
Which staff member issued the punishment?: Dank
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 1 Month
Your Steam Name: any name you wish
Your Roleplay Name: Ted Hastings
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:61037935
Why were you banned/blacklisted?: 1.4, 2.5, 2.6, 3.4 - User planned blowing up his own appartment with another user in totally excessive way and then let said user do the crime so he would not get banned knowing the crime to be excessive
Why should this appeal be considered?: Firstly 1.4, I'm not sure how this could possibly apply here as I simply did not cause any problems at all.
As for 2.5, you said that this action was excessive and not justifiable given the crime, however, Murtsley had just murdered someone in the eyes of the law and would've been imprisoned for 10 years and given a £10,000 fine due to the presence of a medic who would've uploaded DNA of the body and a warrant would likely have been set. If we had instead dragged the body out into the forest we would've undoubtedly been seen by the medic or potentially a police officer speeding up his arrest and not allowing us to escape at all.
As for 3.4, I have no idea how I risked my life here given I was standing on the bridge and the only reason I died was because @Dank abused his permissions and spawned in an AS50 to shoot me point blank (despite missing twice)
I did not think that this action was excessive whatsoever so felt no need to report @Murtsley to staff as you said I should've and because you banned me for 2.6. Murtsleys action was entirely justifiable given his previous crime and the fact no one else was in the apartment complex at the time. He even asked @Ellie how to start the fire and she teleported to him and still told him how to do it.
You can also see in the demo that the fire started was relatively small and achieved the desired effect by causing the body to burn, I'm unaware as to what happened after this but this could've easily been dealt with by the PLPD using fire extinguishers and caused no real problems for anyone. The only person who broke 3.4 here was Dank for AS50ing me for no reason and getting himself a warrant for 9.5.
Edit:
I just found out a police officer had managed to extinguish it using a fire extinguisher that they had already used on another fire and still had plenty left so clearly the fire wasn't that big and only achieved it's desired effect of removing DNA from the body. (@nutrient10)
Additional Information: https://mega.nz/file/tp0TUTIC#YDm56vd5zYLFwtcSMBiHalUTSfO3KmguMcw5WqxyHBI
Last edited: