please read in its entirety before conclusions are made
Punishment Type: Ban
Appeal Type: Dispute
Which staff member issued the punishment?: TinySlayer
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 1 Year
Your Steam Name: Sorle
Your Roleplay Name: Alfa Ross
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:51990442
Why were you banned/blacklisted?: 1.4, 3.2 - Failure to act honestly when questioned about a situation. Communication using third party applications. - disputing 3.2
Why should this appeal be considered?: we agreed on the deal on an OOC basis on discord under this rule:
knowing this, watch this video and tell me what about this could've been metagamed just using critical thinking without any outside bias
there is quite literally zero capacity for anything done within my time on the server to be metagamed it's genuinely just confusing how these conclusions have been reached - PLEASE JUST WATCH THE VIDEO AND TELL ME WHERE THERE IS CAPACITY FOR METAGAMING
he made an advert selling leaves, i called him, gave him a location, tried doing the deal and got mugged for it, and left shortly after - my demo file supports this
feels like i'm just being kept banned to prove a point tbh, i don't really put it down to tiny at this stage it's not really on him & i'm glad he could see it wasn't real world trading
Additional Information: please just read what i said and look at the evidence and give me some form of reasonable counter-argument if you're going to deny this because it's genuinely mind-boggling how this is held up
this situation has tilted me to the end of the world and back and raised my blood pressure by an unhealthy amount and i just wanna get some amount of closure and the only way i will accept closure is with the truth being held up instead of me being banned to prove a point
Punishment Type: Ban
Appeal Type: Dispute
Which staff member issued the punishment?: TinySlayer
How long were you banned/blacklisted for?: 1 Year
Your Steam Name: Sorle
Your Roleplay Name: Alfa Ross
Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:51990442
Why were you banned/blacklisted?: 1.4, 3.2 - Failure to act honestly when questioned about a situation. Communication using third party applications. - disputing 3.2
Why should this appeal be considered?: we agreed on the deal on an OOC basis on discord under this rule:
knowing this, watch this video and tell me what about this could've been metagamed just using critical thinking without any outside bias
there is quite literally zero capacity for anything done within my time on the server to be metagamed it's genuinely just confusing how these conclusions have been reached - PLEASE JUST WATCH THE VIDEO AND TELL ME WHERE THERE IS CAPACITY FOR METAGAMING
nothing that affected any in-character decisions could've been communicated, just look at the video, every single base was covered in-characterAny and all forms of communication about any topic which affects In-Character decisions must be conducted through In-Character methods;
he made an advert selling leaves, i called him, gave him a location, tried doing the deal and got mugged for it, and left shortly after - my demo file supports this
9.25 MB file on MEGA
mega.nz
feels like i'm just being kept banned to prove a point tbh, i don't really put it down to tiny at this stage it's not really on him & i'm glad he could see it wasn't real world trading
Additional Information: please just read what i said and look at the evidence and give me some form of reasonable counter-argument if you're going to deny this because it's genuinely mind-boggling how this is held up
this situation has tilted me to the end of the world and back and raised my blood pressure by an unhealthy amount and i just wanna get some amount of closure and the only way i will accept closure is with the truth being held up instead of me being banned to prove a point
Last edited: