This was a very tricky one so It took me some time to reply. It took me several hours and help from DannyD to come to a conclusion.
Liam will be punished for breaking 2.5, 3.4 and 2.1 by shooting and killing both officers outside of the door without a valid reason to do so. They requested to search the apartment because you had bullet holes and barricaded windows in the main room. Now you gave them a perfectly good reason and they had no more evidence so they should not have attempted to raid you, At this point you should of made a report about the situation so a mod/admin can attend the situation and stop any rule breakage. I will explain into detail of how you broke these rules and if you had a good enough reason.
Before any punishment is given Liam I would like to talk with you in perp or teamspeak along with the officers involved.
2.1: Instead of simply removing the barricades you decided to keep them there. Even when there was nothing in the main room. Now When we talked in the sit prior to this AR you did not mention did not know which barricades they meant forcing me to believe that this was an excuse for your actions.
3.4: You put your life at risk because you had shot through the walls at police officer for asking you to open the doors for them. After
@MatStar Had told you that he will force entry if you did not open. Instead of finding out what they were going to do you shot through the door to kill them.
2.5: By killing the both officers when they were simply trying to get you to open the door (without knowing their intentions) You put a negative impact onto their role play.
After looking at the Demo.
@Slayerduck and
@MatStar I see some major things that you both failed to attend to before threatening these guys with a warrant. Once they were threatened with a search warrant they had the right to kill you to preserve their drugs. Read bellow:
11.2:
LEOs must have observed some or all of the following examples of suspicious activity: Barricaded windows and/or entrances, regular instances where people enter the property who have not been there before and do not return after leaving, and/or regular instances where the number of occupants within the building exceed the number of bedrooms multiplied by 3. However if the Occupant(s) of the property can provide a reasonable justification for the above examples of suspicious activity the matter may be dismissed. The occupant's justification is directly subject to the LEO's discretion.
From what I've seen, they gave you a perfectly valid explanation that there window was hit when they were getting shot at and was boarded for repair. This should of dismissed any suspicion about the bullets as well, unless the officers disagree with that statement. But seen in the video they seem to acknowledge the possibility of their window being shot and gave them time to close up the window.
Because the window was not removed in a time the police officers set is not enough evidence to initiate a raid. You need more evidence apart from the boarded up windows (See law number 11.2 attached above)
I would also like to mention
@Death Howl and
@Appricey for how they caught onto this situation fast. They both have gave their opinion about how you cannot raid over them simply having barricaded windows.
I will talk with Slayer and Matt in perp or team speak about this situation and take further action if necessary. 
