Make SS accountable under 4.4

  • Thread starter Deleted member 5577
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.

Deleted member 5577

Guest
Is this a new law or a change to current law:
This is a change to current law.

What law do you wish to change/add:
4.4 should be changed from
"
Any elected official or member of the emergency services who acts dishonestly and or not in accordance with the best interests of the city commits the offence of misconduct in a public office.

"
To
"
Any elected official, member of the mayoral secret service or of the emergency service who acts dishonestly and or in a way which could cause harm or unlawful disruption the general population commits the offence of misconduct in a public office.
"
Why should this change/addition be made:
Because at the moment the SS cannot be charged lawfully under 4.4

What is the aim of this change/addition:
To make it possible for SS to be held to account when abusing their job.
 
Messages
249
Reaction score
236
Points
390
Location
Texas
Furthermore they are now accountable to the Internal Affairs division in the PD. So if you see a SS breaking any PD policies you can report them to the IA Division.
 

Deleted member 5577

Guest
"Emergency Services refers to the Paralake Police Department, Paralake Emergency Medical Service and the Paralake Fire Department collectively and the individuals that make up these services. "

It just isn't.
 
Messages
9,103
Reaction score
11,467
Points
935
Location
REHAB
If we're gonna get technical Secret Service agents aren't a public service, nor are they emergency service.
 

Daigestive

Professional Stripper
Messages
3,703
Reaction score
8,006
Points
395
Location
Palestine
SS are police officers and are to be treated as their rank while on duty. Either way i domt see how a SS can break this without breaking rule 4.1
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top