Suggestion Title: Overhaul of Observation Reports
Suggestion Description: I am proposing that there is now a scoring system for Observation Reports to give a better update on how an officer is progressing as right now, it's the same monotonous tone used in every OR with no real direction for the officer. I am proposing the below;
Observation Report Template
Key Performance Areas
Leadership
**Criteria to Assess**:
- Can the officer effectively take command during incidents? **(1-5 points)**
- Does the officer maintain control of the scene? **(1-5 points)**
- Are clear and concise instructions given to other officers and civilians? **(1-5 points)**
- Can the officer de-escalate tense situations appropriately? **(1-5 points)**
**Leadership Total**: [ ] / 20
Communication
**Criteria to Assess**:
- Can the officer use the radio effectively? **(1-5 points)**
- Is the officer's radio language clear and concise? **(1-5 points)**
- Does the officer communicate effectively with civilians and suspects? **(1-5 points)**
- Does the officer maintain professionalism in tone and language? **(1-5 points)**
**Communication Total**: [ ] / 20
Investigative Skills
**Criteria to Assess**:
- Can the officer identify and categorize the correct crime committed? **(1-5 points)**
- Does the officer gather relevant evidence such as weapons? **(1-5 points)**
- Is the officer thorough in searching suspects and gathering evidence? **(1-5 points)**
- Can the officer handle basic investigations independently? **(1-5 points)**
**Investigative Skills Total**: [ ] / 20
Law/Policy Knowledge
**Test on 2 Random Laws**:
1. [Insert law] – Did they answer correctly? [ ] Yes / [ ] No **(5 points or 0 points)**
2. [Insert law] – Did they answer correctly? [ ] Yes / [ ] No **(5 points or 0 points)**
**Law/Policy Knowledge Total**: [ ] / 10
Final Scoring and Rank Performance
**Total Score Across All Criteria**: [ ] / 70
**Performance Summary**:
- **1-20 Points**: Needs significant improvement.
- **21-45 Points**: Meets basic expectations; improvement needed for advancement.
- **46-60 Points**: Performing well; suitable for current rank.
- **61-70 Points**: Exceeding expectations; potential for promotion.
This can be added as a document viewable by CPL+ on PLPD or an adjustment to the website.
Why should this be added?:
Shows a true reflection of officer performance
Gives a structured feedback system
What negatives could this have?:
Some might say it may take longer, but I don't think so.
What problem would this suggestion solve?: Above.
Suggestion Description: I am proposing that there is now a scoring system for Observation Reports to give a better update on how an officer is progressing as right now, it's the same monotonous tone used in every OR with no real direction for the officer. I am proposing the below;
Observation Report Template
Key Performance AreasLeadership
**Criteria to Assess**:
- Can the officer effectively take command during incidents? **(1-5 points)**
- Does the officer maintain control of the scene? **(1-5 points)**
- Are clear and concise instructions given to other officers and civilians? **(1-5 points)**
- Can the officer de-escalate tense situations appropriately? **(1-5 points)**
**Leadership Total**: [ ] / 20
Communication
**Criteria to Assess**:
- Can the officer use the radio effectively? **(1-5 points)**
- Is the officer's radio language clear and concise? **(1-5 points)**
- Does the officer communicate effectively with civilians and suspects? **(1-5 points)**
- Does the officer maintain professionalism in tone and language? **(1-5 points)**
**Communication Total**: [ ] / 20
Investigative Skills
**Criteria to Assess**:
- Can the officer identify and categorize the correct crime committed? **(1-5 points)**
- Does the officer gather relevant evidence such as weapons? **(1-5 points)**
- Is the officer thorough in searching suspects and gathering evidence? **(1-5 points)**
- Can the officer handle basic investigations independently? **(1-5 points)**
**Investigative Skills Total**: [ ] / 20
Law/Policy Knowledge
**Test on 2 Random Laws**:
1. [Insert law] – Did they answer correctly? [ ] Yes / [ ] No **(5 points or 0 points)**
2. [Insert law] – Did they answer correctly? [ ] Yes / [ ] No **(5 points or 0 points)**
**Law/Policy Knowledge Total**: [ ] / 10
Final Scoring and Rank Performance
**Total Score Across All Criteria**: [ ] / 70
**Performance Summary**:
- **1-20 Points**: Needs significant improvement.
- **21-45 Points**: Meets basic expectations; improvement needed for advancement.
- **46-60 Points**: Performing well; suitable for current rank.
- **61-70 Points**: Exceeding expectations; potential for promotion.
This can be added as a document viewable by CPL+ on PLPD or an adjustment to the website.
Why should this be added?:
Shows a true reflection of officer performance
Gives a structured feedback system
What negatives could this have?:
Some might say it may take longer, but I don't think so.
What problem would this suggestion solve?: Above.
